FHCCX vs. FHLC
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC).
FHCCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997. FHLC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013.
Performance
FHCCX vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHCCX vs. FHLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHCCX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C | -9.80% | -5.49% | 3.20% | 3.02% | -13.72% | 10.43% | 20.15% | 26.96% | 6.37% | 23.12% |
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | -4.97% | 15.42% | 2.48% | 2.58% | -5.55% | 20.39% | 18.13% | 21.94% | 4.71% | 23.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHCCX achieves a -9.80% return, which is significantly lower than FHLC's -4.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FHCCX has underperformed FHLC with an annualized return of 5.57%, while FHLC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.60% annualized return.
FHCCX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -9.58%
- YTD
- -9.80%
- 6M
- -16.82%
- 1Y
- -13.69%
- 3Y*
- -3.33%
- 5Y*
- -3.13%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
FHLC
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- -7.46%
- YTD
- -4.97%
- 6M
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 6.14%
- 5Y*
- 5.07%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHCCX vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHCCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FHCCX vs. FHLC — Risk / Return Rank
FHCCX
FHLC
FHCCX vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHCCX | FHLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | 0.26 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | 0.48 | -1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.06 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 0.51 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 1.08 | -2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHCCX | FHLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 0.26 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.34 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.57 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.61 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHCCX and FHLC is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FHCCX vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison
FHCCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FHLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHCCX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.32% | 6.85% | 0.41% | 6.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.84% |
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | 1.44% | 1.40% | 1.51% | 1.40% | 1.30% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.18% | 1.38% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 2.07% |
Drawdowns
FHCCX vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHCCX drawdown since its inception was -45.28%, which is greater than FHLC's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCCX and FHLC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHCCX | FHLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.28% | -28.76% | -16.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.25% | -10.38% | -16.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.67% | -17.73% | -11.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.67% | -28.76% | -0.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.25% | -7.99% | -19.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -5.16% | -4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.08% | 5.04% | +6.04% |
Volatility
FHCCX vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) at 5.14%. This indicates that FHCCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHCCX | FHLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 5.14% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.17% | 10.26% | +11.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.40% | 17.61% | +7.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 14.85% | +4.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 16.82% | +2.73% |