FHCCX vs. ETIHX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FHCCX (Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C) and ETIHX (Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FHCCX returned 6.51%/yr vs 13.53%/yr for ETIHX. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FHCCX charges 1.72%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for ETIHX.

Performance

FHCCX vs. ETIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund (ETIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHCCX achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than ETIHX's 9.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FHCCX has underperformed ETIHX with an annualized return of 6.51%, while ETIHX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.53% annualized return.

FHCCX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.31%
• 6M: 9.98%
• YTD: 10.04%
• 1Y: 9.60%
• 3Y*: 2.43%
• 5Y*: -0.65%
• 10Y*: 6.51%
• ALL TIME*: 9.31%

ETIHX

• 1D: 2.90%
• 1M: -3.94%
• 6M: 11.15%
• YTD: 9.00%
• 1Y: 57.96%
• 3Y*: 14.60%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: 13.53%
• ALL TIME*: 15.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ETIHX Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FHCCX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FHCCX vs. ETIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHCCX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C	10.04%	-5.49%	3.20%	3.02%	-13.72%	10.43%	20.15%	26.96%	6.37%	23.12%
ETIHX Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund	9.00%	56.73%	-10.13%	11.01%	-19.62%	-16.87%	37.12%	58.74%	-0.27%	45.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FHCCX and ETIHX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.79

The correlation between FHCCX and ETIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHCCX vs. ETIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHCCX

FHCCX Risk / Return Rank: 9
FHCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FHCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FHCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
FHCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FHCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

ETIHX

ETIHX Risk / Return Rank: 89
ETIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
ETIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ETIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
ETIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ETIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHCCX vs. ETIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund (ETIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHCCX	ETIHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	2.33	-1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.55	3.04	-2.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.37	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.31	4.72	-4.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.54	13.34	-12.80

FHCCX vs. ETIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHCCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the ETIHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHCCX and ETIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHCCX vs. ETIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHCCX drawdown since its inception was -45.28%, smaller than the maximum ETIHX drawdown of -55.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCCX and ETIHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHCCX	ETIHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.28%	-55.11%	+9.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.25%	-12.50%	-14.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.25%	-33.23%	+5.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.67%	-49.27%	+19.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.67%	-55.11%	+25.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.25%	-5.74%	-5.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.22%	-17.83%	+7.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.50%	4.41%	+11.09%

Volatility

FHCCX vs. ETIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) is 5.13%, while Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund (ETIHX) has a volatility of 8.37%. This indicates that FHCCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHCCX	ETIHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.13%	8.37%	-3.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.45%	20.58%	-7.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.46%	25.32%	-0.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.78%	28.06%	-8.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.61%	28.34%	-8.73%

FHCCX vs. ETIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHCCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than ETIHX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHCCX vs. ETIHX - Dividend Comparison

Neither FHCCX nor ETIHX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ETIHX Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	10.78%	3.49%	2.08%	7.33%	1.28%	0.00%	1.22%
FHCCX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C	0.00%	0.00%	17.59%	0.00%	0.00%	8.32%	6.85%	0.41%	6.43%	0.00%	0.00%	7.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHCCX and ETIHX in my portfolio?

FHCCX and ETIHX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHCCX or ETIHX?

ETIHX has higher volatility (8.37%) compared to FHCCX (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHCCX dropped -45.28% vs ETIHX's -55.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ETIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.