PDCZX vs. TPDAX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Income Builder Fund (PDCZX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX).
PDCZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Nov 17, 1998. TPDAX is managed by Timothy Plan. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009.
Performance
PDCZX vs. TPDAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PDCZX vs. TPDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDCZX PGIM Income Builder Fund | 1.75% | 14.51% | 13.16% | 11.00% | -10.75% | 10.63% | 2.94% | 19.84% | -6.24% | 8.17% |
TPDAX Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund | 7.48% | 23.97% | 5.29% | 7.71% | -5.63% | 12.15% | 8.83% | 13.77% | -7.24% | 4.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDCZX achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than TPDAX's 7.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PDCZX having a 6.87% annualized return and TPDAX not far ahead at 7.10%.
PDCZX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 3.37%
- 1Y
- 13.15%
- 3Y*
- 12.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 6.87%
TPDAX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 24.49%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PDCZX vs. TPDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDCZX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TPDAX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PDCZX vs. TPDAX — Risk / Return Rank
PDCZX
TPDAX
PDCZX vs. TPDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Income Builder Fund (PDCZX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDCZX | TPDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 2.07 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 2.68 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.33 | -1.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.87 | 12.75 | -3.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDCZX | TPDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 2.07 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.95 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.58 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between PDCZX and TPDAX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PDCZX vs. TPDAX - Dividend Comparison
PDCZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than TPDAX's 0.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDCZX PGIM Income Builder Fund | 4.54% | 5.19% | 8.63% | 5.21% | 4.71% | 5.61% | 4.07% | 4.28% | 4.72% | 4.59% | 4.80% | 5.33% |
TPDAX Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund | 0.75% | 0.80% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 4.48% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 2.89% | 2.69% | 0.13% | 0.33% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PDCZX vs. TPDAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDCZX drawdown since its inception was -31.16%, which is greater than TPDAX's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDCZX and TPDAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDCZX | TPDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.16% | -22.29% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.27% | -7.58% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | -17.58% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.16% | -22.29% | -8.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.72% | -6.56% | +1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -4.94% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 1.98% | -0.51% |
Volatility
PDCZX vs. TPDAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Income Builder Fund (PDCZX) is 2.97%, while Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that PDCZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PDCZX | TPDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 4.00% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.66% | 9.73% | -5.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.20% | 12.21% | -4.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.33% | 10.12% | -1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.56% | 9.86% | -0.30% |