PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDCZX vs. QBDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDCZX vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Income Builder Fund (PDCZX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDCZX achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly higher than QBDSX's -0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PDCZX has outperformed QBDSX with an annualized return of 6.87%, while QBDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.56% annualized return.


PDCZX

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.49%
6M
5.14%
YTD
8.36%
1Y
14.81%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
6.87%
ALL TIME*
6.01%

QBDSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.13%
6M
-1.00%
YTD
-0.25%
1Y
0.15%
3Y*
2.28%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*
0.56%
ALL TIME*
0.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PDCZX vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDCZX
PGIM Income Builder Fund
8.36%14.51%13.16%11.00%-10.75%10.63%2.94%19.84%-6.24%8.17%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
-0.25%5.11%1.02%2.25%-4.09%-0.66%-9.22%10.50%-3.17%5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PDCZX and QBDSX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.49

The correlation between PDCZX and QBDSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDCZX vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PDCZX
PDCZX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PDCZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDCZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDCZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PDCZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDCZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

QBDSX
QBDSX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
QBDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
QBDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PDCZX vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Income Builder Fund (PDCZX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDCZXQBDSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.00

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

-0.03

+3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.14

-0.07

+13.21

PDCZX vs. QBDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDCZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the QBDSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDCZX and QBDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDCZX vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDCZX drawdown since its inception was -31.16%, which is greater than QBDSX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDCZX and QBDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDCZXQBDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.16%

-18.38%

-12.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.72%

-3.09%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.48%

-3.76%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

-7.40%

-10.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.16%

-18.38%

-12.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-8.29%

+7.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-6.86%

+3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

1.43%

-0.30%

Volatility

PDCZX vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Income Builder Fund (PDCZX) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 0.75%. This indicates that PDCZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDCZXQBDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

0.75%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.41%

2.38%

+3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.48%

3.52%

+2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.32%

4.31%

+4.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.58%

5.24%

+4.34%

PDCZX vs. QBDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDCZX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QBDSX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDCZX vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison

PDCZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than QBDSX's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDCZX
PGIM Income Builder Fund
4.63%5.19%8.63%5.21%4.71%5.61%4.07%4.28%4.72%4.59%4.80%5.33%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
4.49%4.47%3.98%4.51%0.54%0.71%0.87%2.26%2.04%2.51%1.00%3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDCZX and QBDSX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDCZX has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to QBDSX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDCZX dropped -31.16% vs QBDSX's -18.38%.

PDCZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDCZX and QBDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer