PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PD.TO vs. HAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PD.TO vs. HAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Precision Drilling Corporation (PD.TO) and Halliburton Company (HAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PD.TO is traded in CAD, while HAL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HAL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PD.TO achieves a 39.44% return, which is significantly lower than HAL's 42.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PD.TO has underperformed HAL with an annualized return of 0.04%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively higher 1.22% annualized return.


PD.TO

1D
3.94%
1M
9.78%
YTD
39.44%
6M
45.71%
1Y
117.09%
3Y*
31.26%
5Y*
23.74%
10Y*
0.04%

HAL

1D
-4.75%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
42.11%
6M
40.21%
1Y
104.83%
3Y*
11.76%
5Y*
15.02%
10Y*
1.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PD.TO vs. HAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PD.TO
Precision Drilling Corporation
39.44%12.02%22.18%-30.61%132.07%113.52%-42.18%-23.63%-37.80%-47.95%
HAL
Halliburton Company
42.11%2.11%-16.59%-8.53%86.89%20.89%-22.56%-9.57%-39.93%-14.03%

Correlation

The correlation between PD.TO and HAL is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009

0.57

The correlation between PD.TO and HAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PD.TO:

CA$1.78B

HAL:

$32.87B

EPS

PD.TO:

-CA$1.13

HAL:

$1.82

PS Ratio

PD.TO:

0.99

HAL:

1.50

PB Ratio

PD.TO:

1.10

HAL:

3.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

PD.TO:

CA$1.87B

HAL:

$22.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PD.TO:

CA$628.52M

HAL:

$3.40B

EBITDA (TTM)

PD.TO:

CA$485.26M

HAL:

$3.83B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PD.TO vs. HAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PD.TO
PD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

HAL
HAL Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
HAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PD.TO vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Precision Drilling Corporation (PD.TO) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PD.TOHALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.42

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.97

8.52

-2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.01

21.72

+1.29

PD.TO vs. HAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is comparable to the HAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PD.TO and HAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PD.TOHALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.28

2.86

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.39

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

0.03

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.17

-0.12

Drawdowns

PD.TO vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PD.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, which is greater than HAL's maximum drawdown of -90.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PD.TO and HAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PD.TOHALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.36%

-90.55%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.54%

-12.38%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.00%

-53.39%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.69%

-53.39%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.78%

-90.55%

-4.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.31%

-14.12%

-75.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.62%

-31.86%

-33.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.06%

4.84%

+0.22%

Volatility

PD.TO vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison

Precision Drilling Corporation (PD.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.04% compared to Halliburton Company (HAL) at 10.08%. This indicates that PD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PD.TOHALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.04%

10.08%

+2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.31%

24.24%

+3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.55%

36.84%

-1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.51%

38.18%

+8.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.48%

43.76%

+13.72%

Dividends

PD.TO vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison

PD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAL
Halliburton Company
1.74%2.41%2.50%1.77%1.22%0.79%1.67%2.94%2.71%1.47%1.33%2.12%
PD.TO
Precision Drilling Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.12%

Financials

PD.TO vs. HAL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Precision Drilling Corporation and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
526.05M
5.40B
(PD.TO) Total Revenue
(HAL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PD.TO values in CAD, HAL values in USD

PD.TO vs. HAL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Precision Drilling Corporation and Halliburton Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
15.5%
14.6%
Portfolio components
PD.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Precision Drilling Corporation reported a gross profit of 81.36M and revenue of 526.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.5%.

HAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 790.00M and revenue of 5.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.

PD.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Precision Drilling Corporation reported an operating income of 39.62M and revenue of 526.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.

HAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.

PD.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Precision Drilling Corporation reported a net income of 17.38M and revenue of 526.05M, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.

HAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 461.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PD.TO and HAL have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PD.TO and HAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer