PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCYO vs. CCJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PCYO vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCYO achieves a -1.64% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's -1.41% return. Over the past 10 years, PCYO has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 9.41%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 24.79% annualized return.


PCYO

1D
0.46%
1M
0.75%
6M
-6.00%
YTD
-1.64%
1Y
7.56%
3Y*
-1.17%
5Y*
-4.66%
10Y*
9.41%

CCJ

1D
-6.03%
1M
-10.66%
6M
-17.84%
YTD
-1.41%
1Y
24.31%
3Y*
42.22%
5Y*
39.14%
10Y*
24.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCYO vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCYO
Pure Cycle Corporation
-1.64%-13.33%21.11%-0.10%-28.22%30.01%-10.80%26.79%18.92%51.82%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
-1.41%78.38%19.47%90.49%4.35%63.19%51.47%-21.08%23.58%-8.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PCYO and CCJ is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PCYO:

$260.49M

CCJ:

$39.29B

EPS

PCYO:

$0.69

CCJ:

CA$1.49

PE Ratio

PCYO:

15.70

CCJ:

85.54

PEG Ratio

PCYO:

1.25

CCJ:

0.71

PS Ratio

PCYO:

7.75

CCJ:

15.73

PB Ratio

PCYO:

1.72

CCJ:

7.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

PCYO:

$33.73M

CCJ:

CA$3.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PCYO:

$19.48M

CCJ:

CA$1.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

PCYO:

$19.93M

CCJ:

CA$996.66M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCYO vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCYO
PCYO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PCYO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCYO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCYO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PCYO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCYO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CCJ
CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCYO vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCYOCCJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.12

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

0.75

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.99

1.77

-0.78

PCYO vs. CCJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCYO Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCYO and CCJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCYO vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCYO drawdown since its inception was -89.13%, roughly equal to the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCYO and CCJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCYOCCJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.13%

-87.53%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.50%

-32.73%

+15.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.36%

-40.01%

+6.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.46%

-40.01%

-11.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.49%

-57.22%

+4.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.25%

-32.73%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.38%

-46.02%

-6.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.64%

13.77%

-6.13%

Volatility

PCYO vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) is 8.84%, while Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a volatility of 12.52%. This indicates that PCYO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCYOCCJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.84%

12.52%

-3.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.91%

39.77%

-15.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.58%

55.47%

-25.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.27%

49.88%

-17.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.57%

46.84%

-11.27%

Dividends

PCYO vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

PCYO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
0.19%0.19%0.22%0.20%0.39%0.29%0.46%0.67%0.53%4.33%3.82%3.24%
PCYO
Pure Cycle Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PCYO vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pure Cycle Corporation and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
8.22M
847.55M
(PCYO) Total Revenue
(CCJ) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PCYO values in USD, CCJ values in CAD

PCYO vs. CCJ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pure Cycle Corporation and Cameco Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
52.1%
34.3%
Portfolio components
PCYO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Pure Cycle Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.29M and revenue of 8.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.1%.

CCJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.00M and revenue of 847.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.

PCYO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Pure Cycle Corporation reported an operating income of 2.11M and revenue of 8.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.

CCJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 154.28M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

PCYO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Pure Cycle Corporation reported a net income of 4.86M and revenue of 8.22M, resulting in a net margin of 59.1%.

CCJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 131.09M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PCYO and CCJ have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCJ has higher volatility (12.52%) compared to PCYO (8.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCYO dropped -89.13% vs CCJ's -87.53%.

CCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCYO and CCJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer