PCYO vs. GNE

In the year-to-date period, PCYO achieves a 16.14% return, which is significantly higher than GNE's -47.36% return. Over the past 10 years, PCYO has underperformed GNE with an annualized return of 10.02%, while GNE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) and Genie Energy Ltd. (GNE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PCYO Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the GNE Sharpe Ratio of -1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCYO and GNE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PCYO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%.

The maximum PCYO drawdown since its inception was -89.13%, which is greater than GNE's maximum drawdown of -75.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCYO and GNE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) has a higher volatility of 11.71% compared to Genie Energy Ltd. (GNE) at 7.83%. This indicates that PCYO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pure Cycle Corporation and Genie Energy Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.