PortfoliosLab logo
PCYO vs. GNE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PCYO and GNE is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PCYO vs. GNE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) and Genie Energy Ltd. (GNE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PCYO:

0.44

GNE:

1.42

Sortino Ratio

PCYO:

0.85

GNE:

2.08

Omega Ratio

PCYO:

1.10

GNE:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

PCYO:

0.30

GNE:

0.82

Martin Ratio

PCYO:

0.81

GNE:

4.00

Ulcer Index

PCYO:

16.93%

GNE:

11.01%

Daily Std Dev

PCYO:

35.05%

GNE:

30.47%

Max Drawdown

PCYO:

-89.13%

GNE:

-75.12%

Current Drawdown

PCYO:

-35.40%

GNE:

-29.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PCYO:

$255.69M

GNE:

$567.52M

EPS

PCYO:

$0.59

GNE:

$0.66

PE Ratio

PCYO:

18.00

GNE:

32.03

PEG Ratio

PCYO:

0.00

GNE:

0.00

PS Ratio

PCYO:

8.55

GNE:

1.28

PB Ratio

PCYO:

1.91

GNE:

2.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

PCYO:

$22.31M

GNE:

$442.32M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PCYO:

$14.97M

GNE:

$133.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

PCYO:

$17.10M

GNE:

$19.69M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCYO achieves a -16.25% return, which is significantly lower than GNE's 36.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PCYO has underperformed GNE with an annualized return of 7.44%, while GNE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.35% annualized return.


PCYO

YTD

-16.25%

1M

5.25%

6M

-26.96%

1Y

14.19%

3Y*

-2.05%

5Y*

0.89%

10Y*

7.44%

GNE

YTD

36.88%

1M

37.93%

6M

39.84%

1Y

41.15%

3Y*

39.79%

5Y*

22.19%

10Y*

8.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Pure Cycle Corporation

Genie Energy Ltd.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PCYO vs. GNE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCYO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PCYO is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PCYO is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PCYO is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PCYO is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PCYO is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PCYO is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

GNE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GNE is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GNE is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GNE is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GNE is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GNE is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GNE is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PCYO vs. GNE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) and Genie Energy Ltd. (GNE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PCYO Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the GNE Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCYO and GNE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PCYO vs. GNE - Dividend Comparison

PCYO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PCYO
Pure Cycle Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GNE
Genie Energy Ltd.
1.42%1.92%1.07%2.90%0.00%4.58%3.88%4.98%6.88%4.17%1.08%0.97%

Drawdowns

PCYO vs. GNE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCYO drawdown since its inception was -89.13%, which is greater than GNE's maximum drawdown of -75.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCYO and GNE.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PCYO vs. GNE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) is 9.19%, while Genie Energy Ltd. (GNE) has a volatility of 9.90%. This indicates that PCYO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GNE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PCYO vs. GNE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pure Cycle Corporation and Genie Energy Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
4.00M
136.81M
(PCYO) Total Revenue
(GNE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PCYO vs. GNE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pure Cycle Corporation and Genie Energy Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
38.2%
27.3%
(PCYO) Gross Margin
(GNE) Gross Margin
PCYO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Pure Cycle Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53M and revenue of 4.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.2%.

GNE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Genie Energy Ltd. reported a gross profit of 37.36M and revenue of 136.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.

PCYO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Pure Cycle Corporation reported an operating income of -1.33M and revenue of 4.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -33.2%.

GNE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Genie Energy Ltd. reported an operating income of 12.83M and revenue of 136.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

PCYO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Pure Cycle Corporation reported a net income of 809.00K and revenue of 4.00M, resulting in a net margin of 20.3%.

GNE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Genie Energy Ltd. reported a net income of 10.63M and revenue of 136.81M, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.