PortfoliosLab logo
PCYO vs. NRGV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PCYO and NRGV is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PCYO vs. NRGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) and Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PCYO:

0.44

NRGV:

-0.30

Sortino Ratio

PCYO:

0.85

NRGV:

0.45

Omega Ratio

PCYO:

1.10

NRGV:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

PCYO:

0.30

NRGV:

-0.37

Martin Ratio

PCYO:

0.81

NRGV:

-0.88

Ulcer Index

PCYO:

16.93%

NRGV:

40.18%

Daily Std Dev

PCYO:

35.05%

NRGV:

129.29%

Max Drawdown

PCYO:

-89.13%

NRGV:

-97.09%

Current Drawdown

PCYO:

-35.40%

NRGV:

-96.18%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PCYO:

$255.69M

NRGV:

$128.91M

EPS

PCYO:

$0.59

NRGV:

-$0.91

PS Ratio

PCYO:

8.55

NRGV:

2.74

PB Ratio

PCYO:

1.91

NRGV:

1.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

PCYO:

$22.31M

NRGV:

$46.97M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PCYO:

$14.97M

NRGV:

$9.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

PCYO:

$17.10M

NRGV:

-$134.40M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCYO achieves a -16.25% return, which is significantly higher than NRGV's -63.77% return.


PCYO

YTD

-16.25%

1M

5.25%

6M

-26.96%

1Y

14.19%

3Y*

-2.05%

5Y*

0.89%

10Y*

7.44%

NRGV

YTD

-63.77%

1M

14.93%

6M

-59.90%

1Y

-36.94%

3Y*

-62.15%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Pure Cycle Corporation

Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PCYO vs. NRGV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCYO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PCYO is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PCYO is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PCYO is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PCYO is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PCYO is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PCYO is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

NRGV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NRGV is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NRGV is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NRGV is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NRGV is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NRGV is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NRGV is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PCYO vs. NRGV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) and Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PCYO Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the NRGV Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCYO and NRGV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PCYO vs. NRGV - Dividend Comparison

Neither PCYO nor NRGV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PCYO vs. NRGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCYO drawdown since its inception was -89.13%, smaller than the maximum NRGV drawdown of -97.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCYO and NRGV.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PCYO vs. NRGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) is 9.19%, while Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) has a volatility of 43.29%. This indicates that PCYO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PCYO vs. NRGV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pure Cycle Corporation and Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
4.00M
8.53M
(PCYO) Total Revenue
(NRGV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items