PCYO vs. NRGV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) and Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV).

Performance

PCYO vs. NRGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) and Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PCYO vs. NRGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PCYO Pure Cycle Corporation	-6.19%	-13.33%	21.11%	-0.10%	-11.86%
NRGV Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.	-26.25%	102.19%	-2.15%	-25.32%	-66.77%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PCYO : $249.05M NRGV : $571.14M
EPS PCYO : $0.57 NRGV : -$0.64
PS Ratio PCYO : 8.45 NRGV : 2.72
PB Ratio PCYO : 1.69 NRGV : 8.47
Total Revenue (TTM) PCYO : $29.47M NRGV : $203.67M
Gross Profit (TTM) PCYO : $17.37M NRGV : $47.99M
EBITDA (TTM) PCYO : $21.04M NRGV : -$75.02M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCYO achieves a -6.19% return, which is significantly higher than NRGV's -26.25% return.

PCYO

• 1D: 2.49%
• 1M: -2.37%
• YTD: -6.19%
• 6M: -6.19%
• 1Y: -3.46%
• 3Y*: 2.95%
• 5Y*: -5.19%
• 10Y*: 8.57%

NRGV

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: 4.62%
• YTD: -26.25%
• 6M: 5.92%
• 1Y: 285.27%
• 3Y*: 16.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PCYO vs. NRGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCYO

PCYO Risk / Return Rank: 34
PCYO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
PCYO Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
PCYO Omega Ratio Rank: 29
PCYO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
PCYO Martin Ratio Rank: 37

NRGV

NRGV Risk / Return Rank: 93
NRGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
NRGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
NRGV Omega Ratio Rank: 87
NRGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NRGV Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCYO vs. NRGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) and Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCYO	NRGV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	2.58	-2.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.04	2.92	-2.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.36	-0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.09	7.64	-7.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.21	16.63	-16.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCYO vs. NRGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCYO Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the NRGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCYO and NRGV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCYO	NRGV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12	2.58	-2.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	-0.19	+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between PCYO and NRGV is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PCYO vs. NRGV - Dividend Comparison

Neither PCYO nor NRGV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PCYO vs. NRGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCYO drawdown since its inception was -89.13%, smaller than the maximum NRGV drawdown of -97.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCYO and NRGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCYO	NRGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.13%	-97.09%	+7.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.50%	-50.91%	+33.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.29%	-84.29%	+47.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.56%	-82.94%	+30.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.30%	23.38%	-16.08%

Volatility

PCYO vs. NRGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) is 8.09%, while Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) has a volatility of 23.14%. This indicates that PCYO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCYO	NRGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.09%	23.14%	-15.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.09%	74.73%	-55.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.42%	114.20%	-84.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.33%	113.69%	-81.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.69%	113.69%	-78.00%

Financials

PCYO vs. NRGV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pure Cycle Corporation and Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PCYO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pure Cycle Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.25M and revenue of 9.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.4%.

NRGV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 31.59M and revenue of 153.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.6%.

PCYO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pure Cycle Corporation reported an operating income of 4.38M and revenue of 9.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.

NRGV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -7.74M and revenue of 153.31M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.1%.

PCYO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pure Cycle Corporation reported a net income of 4.57M and revenue of 9.14M, resulting in a net margin of 50.0%.

NRGV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -20.73M and revenue of 153.31M, resulting in a net margin of -13.5%.