PCT vs. BKNG
PCT (PureCycle Technologies, Inc.) and BKNG (Booking Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. PCT operates in Pollution & Treatment Controls (Industrials), while BKNG operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, PCT returned -15.53%/yr vs 17.72%/yr for BKNG. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PCT vs. BKNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCT achieves a -25.84% return, which is significantly lower than BKNG's -9.52% return.
PCT
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -16.29%
- 6M
- -33.37%
- YTD
- -25.84%
- 1Y
- -49.52%
- 3Y*
- -17.42%
- 5Y*
- -15.53%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -7.49%
BKNG
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- 6M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- -9.52%
- 1Y
- -9.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 17.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.08B | $1.12B | $1.29B | |
| $20.67M | $26.68M | $51.25M |
PCT vs. BKNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCT PureCycle Technologies, Inc. | -25.84% | -16.20% | 153.09% | -40.09% | -29.36% | -40.67% | 58.14% |
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | -9.52% | 8.59% | 41.31% | 76.02% | -16.00% | 7.72% | 32.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCT and BKNG is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2020 | 0.17 |
The correlation between PCT and BKNG shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PCT:
$1.28B
BKNG:
$149.47B
PCT:
-$1.24
BKNG:
$7.62
PCT:
106.24
BKNG:
5.63
PCT:
$10.90M
BKNG:
$27.69B
PCT:
-$112.92M
BKNG:
$22.16B
PCT:
-$117.00M
BKNG:
$9.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCT vs. BKNG — Risk / Return Rank
PCT
BKNG
PCT vs. BKNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCT | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.97 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | -0.36 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | -0.64 | -0.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCT vs. BKNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCT drawdown since its inception was -92.66%, smaller than the maximum BKNG drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCT and BKNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCT | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.66% | -99.32% | +6.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.56% | -32.25% | -34.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.97% | -33.35% | -45.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.52% | -39.53% | -45.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.51% | -16.38% | -64.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.49% | -46.93% | -16.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.79% | 18.10% | +21.69% |
Volatility
PCT vs. BKNG - Volatility Comparison
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT) has a higher volatility of 23.72% compared to Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) at 12.74%. This indicates that PCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCT | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.72% | 12.74% | +10.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.92% | 30.84% | +32.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.76% | 35.40% | +46.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.29% | 32.90% | +59.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.86% | 32.58% | +58.28% |
Dividends
PCT vs. BKNG - Dividend Comparison
PCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BKNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | 0.83% | 0.72% | 0.70% |
PCT PureCycle Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PCT vs. BKNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PureCycle Technologies, Inc. and Booking Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PCT and BKNG have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCT has higher volatility (23.72%) compared to BKNG (12.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCT dropped -92.66% vs BKNG's -99.32%.
BKNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCT and BKNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer