PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCT vs. AVGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PCT vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCT achieves a 49.53% return, which is significantly higher than AVGO's 39.43% return.


PCT

1D
5.03%
1M
63.42%
YTD
49.53%
6M
54.20%
1Y
38.12%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
-7.47%
10Y*

AVGO

1D
4.70%
1M
14.31%
YTD
39.43%
6M
26.71%
1Y
95.20%
3Y*
83.43%
5Y*
62.84%
10Y*
43.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCT vs. AVGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PCT
PureCycle Technologies, Inc.
49.53%-16.20%153.09%-40.09%-29.36%-40.67%58.14%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
39.43%50.63%110.49%104.18%-13.27%56.48%41.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PCT and AVGO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2020

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PCT:

$2.32B

AVGO:

$2.35T

EPS

PCT:

-$1.24

AVGO:

$5.12

PS Ratio

PCT:

213.60

AVGO:

34.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

PCT:

$10.90M

AVGO:

$68.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PCT:

-$112.92M

AVGO:

$46.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

PCT:

-$117.00M

AVGO:

$36.65B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCT vs. AVGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCT
PCT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCT Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCT Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGO
AVGO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AVGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCT vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCTAVGODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

2.23

-1.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

2.88

-1.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.36

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

3.51

-3.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.88

8.44

-7.56

PCT vs. AVGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCT Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the AVGO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCT and AVGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCTAVGODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

2.23

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

1.48

-1.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

1.14

-1.10

Drawdowns

PCT vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCT drawdown since its inception was -92.66%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCT and AVGO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCTAVGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.66%

-48.30%

-44.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.09%

-28.67%

-41.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.73%

-41.15%

-38.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.61%

-41.15%

-49.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.71%

0.00%

-60.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.20%

-7.97%

-55.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.90%

11.91%

+27.99%

Volatility

PCT vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison

PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT) has a higher volatility of 29.55% compared to Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) at 11.99%. This indicates that PCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCTAVGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.55%

11.99%

+17.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.24%

31.01%

+32.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.37%

43.01%

+37.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

92.37%

42.79%

+49.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.10%

39.19%

+51.91%

Dividends

PCT vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison

PCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.51%0.70%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%
PCT
PureCycle Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PCT vs. AVGO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PureCycle Technologies, Inc. and Broadcom Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
4.13M
19.31B
(PCT) Total Revenue
(AVGO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PCT and AVGO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCT has higher volatility (29.55%) compared to AVGO (11.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCT dropped -92.66% vs AVGO's -48.30%.

AVGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCT and AVGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer