PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCSG vs. PCLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCSG vs. PCLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF (PCSG) and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PCSG

1D
-3.77%
1M
-5.56%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PCLG

1D
-0.18%
1M
-5.24%
6M
-10.49%
YTD
-11.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCSG vs. PCLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PCSG and PCLG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCSG vs. PCLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF (PCSG) and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PCSG vs. PCLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCSG vs. PCLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCSG drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, smaller than the maximum PCLG drawdown of -23.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSG and PCLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCSGPCLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-23.78%

+14.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.24%

-15.47%

+8.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-10.19%

+7.62%

Volatility

PCSG vs. PCLG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCSGPCLGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.20%

17.96%

+19.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.20%

17.96%

+19.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.20%

17.96%

+19.24%

PCSG vs. PCLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCSG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCSG vs. PCLG - Dividend Comparison

PCSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PCLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.


PositionTTM2025
PCLG
Polen Focus Growth ETF
0.04%0.03%
PCSG
Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCSG and PCLG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PCLG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PCLG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PCSG.

PCLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for PCSG.

PCSG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PCLG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PCSG and 0.49% for PCLG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCSG and PCLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer