PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCSG vs. PCLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCSG vs. PCLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF (PCSG) and Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF (PCLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PCSG

1D
-3.77%
1M
-5.56%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PCLC

1D
-1.83%
1M
-4.00%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCSG vs. PCLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PCSG and PCLC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCSG vs. PCLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF (PCSG) and Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF (PCLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PCSG vs. PCLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCSG vs. PCLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCSG drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, smaller than the maximum PCLC drawdown of -9.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSG and PCLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCSGPCLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-9.52%

+0.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.24%

-5.56%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-3.13%

+0.56%

Volatility

PCSG vs. PCLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCSGPCLCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.20%

32.27%

+4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.20%

32.27%

+4.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.20%

32.27%

+4.93%

PCSG vs. PCLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCSG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLC's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCSG vs. PCLC - Dividend Comparison

Neither PCSG nor PCLC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PCSG and PCLC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PCLC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PCLC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PCSG.

PCSG and PCLC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

PCSG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PCLC is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PCSG and 0.50% for PCLC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCSG and PCLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer