PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCRPX vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCRPX vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRPX) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCRPX achieves a 15.90% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 8.21% return. Over the past 10 years, PCRPX has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 7.52%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


PCRPX

1D
-0.83%
1M
-8.78%
YTD
15.90%
6M
12.46%
1Y
23.64%
3Y*
14.35%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*
7.52%

SPYM

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
8.21%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCRPX vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCRPX
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund
15.90%16.26%10.79%-6.20%9.12%33.01%0.73%12.24%-13.90%2.62%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
8.21%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PCRPX and SPYM is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2008

0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between PCRPX and SPYM has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCRPX vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCRPX
PCRPX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PCRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PCRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCRPX vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRPX) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCRPXSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.68

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.78

11.98

-4.20

PCRPX vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCRPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCRPX and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCRPX vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCRPX drawdown since its inception was -72.22%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCRPX and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCRPXSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.22%

-54.46%

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.82%

-8.90%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.82%

-18.72%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.54%

-24.48%

-10.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.15%

-33.87%

-5.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.44%

-3.14%

-9.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.33%

-7.14%

-32.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

1.99%

+1.00%

Volatility

PCRPX vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRPX) is 3.74%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that PCRPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCRPXSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

4.83%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

9.83%

+4.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

12.46%

+4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

16.90%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

18.03%

-0.89%

PCRPX vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCRPX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCRPX vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

PCRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, more than SPYM's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCRPX
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund
10.52%5.09%8.47%6.50%46.40%22.80%1.51%3.93%5.85%8.06%0.83%5.23%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.30%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCRPX and SPYM have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYM has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to PCRPX (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCRPX dropped -72.22% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCRPX and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer