PCRPX vs. PDBC
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRPX) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC).
PCRPX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Apr 30, 2008. PDBC is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on Nov 7, 2014.
Performance
PCRPX vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCRPX vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCRPX PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund | 21.14% | 16.26% | 10.79% | -6.20% | 9.12% | 33.01% | 0.73% | 12.24% | -13.90% | 2.62% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 30.72% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -12.78% | 5.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCRPX achieves a 21.14% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 30.72% return. Over the past 10 years, PCRPX has underperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 9.23%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.86% annualized return.
PCRPX
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 9.42%
- YTD
- 21.14%
- 6M
- 25.05%
- 1Y
- 27.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
PDBC
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 16.09%
- YTD
- 30.72%
- 6M
- 33.97%
- 1Y
- 32.00%
- 3Y*
- 11.28%
- 5Y*
- 14.29%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCRPX vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCRPX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCRPX vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
PCRPX
PDBC
PCRPX vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRPX) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCRPX | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.76 | 1.72 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 2.31 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.31 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 3.04 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 7.48 | +2.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCRPX | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 1.72 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.76 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.56 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.22 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCRPX and PDBC is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PCRPX vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
PCRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than PDBC's 2.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCRPX PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund | 4.20% | 5.09% | 8.47% | 6.50% | 46.40% | 22.80% | 1.51% | 3.93% | 5.85% | 8.06% | 0.83% | 5.23% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 2.94% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PCRPX vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCRPX drawdown since its inception was -72.22%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCRPX and PDBC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCRPX | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.22% | -49.52% | -22.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -11.07% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.54% | -27.63% | -6.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.15% | -40.73% | +1.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.48% | -1.03% | -7.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.76% | -23.53% | -16.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 4.50% | -1.35% |
Volatility
PCRPX vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRPX) is 7.30%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that PCRPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCRPX | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.30% | 8.15% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | 13.88% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.69% | 18.72% | -2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 18.92% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 17.69% | -0.57% |