PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCRPX vs. FYHTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCRPX vs. FYHTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRPX) and Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCRPX achieves a 15.90% return, which is significantly higher than FYHTX's 13.20% return.


PCRPX

1D
-0.83%
1M
-8.78%
YTD
15.90%
6M
12.46%
1Y
23.64%
3Y*
14.35%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*
7.52%

FYHTX

1D
-0.34%
1M
-6.17%
YTD
13.20%
6M
13.13%
1Y
18.10%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCRPX vs. FYHTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCRPX
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund
15.90%16.26%10.79%-6.20%9.12%33.01%0.73%12.24%-13.90%6.15%
FYHTX
Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund
13.20%14.72%4.73%-8.62%15.32%26.43%-3.84%6.91%-11.71%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PCRPX and FYHTX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2017

0.93

The correlation between PCRPX and FYHTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCRPX vs. FYHTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCRPX
PCRPX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PCRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PCRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FYHTX
FYHTX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FYHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FYHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCRPX vs. FYHTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRPX) and Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCRPXFYHTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.91

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.78

5.76

+2.02

PCRPX vs. FYHTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCRPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the FYHTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCRPX and FYHTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCRPX vs. FYHTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCRPX drawdown since its inception was -72.22%, which is greater than FYHTX's maximum drawdown of -33.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCRPX and FYHTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCRPXFYHTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.22%

-33.22%

-39.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.82%

-9.36%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.82%

-11.52%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.54%

-25.47%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.44%

-9.36%

-3.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.33%

-11.91%

-27.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.19%

-0.20%

Volatility

PCRPX vs. FYHTX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRPX) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) at 3.19%. This indicates that PCRPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYHTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCRPXFYHTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

3.19%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

11.74%

+2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

14.08%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

15.80%

+3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

14.46%

+2.68%

PCRPX vs. FYHTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCRPX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than FYHTX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCRPX vs. FYHTX - Dividend Comparison

PCRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, more than FYHTX's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYHTX
Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund
2.59%2.93%3.78%4.10%57.34%15.05%0.00%7.00%12.49%0.36%0.00%0.00%
PCRPX
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund
10.52%5.09%8.47%6.50%46.40%22.80%1.51%3.93%5.85%8.06%0.83%5.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCRPX and FYHTX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCRPX has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to FYHTX (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCRPX dropped -72.22% vs FYHTX's -33.22%.

PCRPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCRPX and FYHTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer