PCLG vs. SGRT

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

PCLG (Polen Focus Growth ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCLG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

PCLG vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLG achieves a -10.52% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 34.03% return.

PCLG

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.75%
• 6M: -11.53%
• YTD: -10.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -7.07%
• 6M: 27.60%
• YTD: 34.03%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCLG vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF	-10.52%	-0.45%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	34.03%	6.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLG and SGRT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	0.39

Return for Risk

PCLG vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

PCLG vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLG drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLG and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCLG	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.78%	-17.87%	-5.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.45%	-12.78%	-1.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.31%	-3.52%	-6.79%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCLG	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.81%	36.74%	-18.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.81%	36.74%	-18.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.81%	36.74%	-18.93%

PCLG vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCLG vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

PCLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than SGRT's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF	0.04%	0.03%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	0.12%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCLG and SGRT in my portfolio?

PCLG and SGRT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PCLG or SGRT?

On fees, PCLG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCLG or SGRT?

PCLG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCLG or SGRT?

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.04% for PCLG.

What is the main difference between PCLG and SGRT?

Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PCLG and 0.59% for SGRT.