PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCLG vs. PCSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCLG vs. PCSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF (PCSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PCLG

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.75%
6M
-11.53%
YTD
-10.52%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PCSG

1D
-1.40%
1M
-3.74%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCLG vs. PCSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PCLG and PCSG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCLG vs. PCSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF (PCSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PCLG vs. PCSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCLG vs. PCSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLG drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, which is greater than PCSG's maximum drawdown of -9.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLG and PCSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCLGPCSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.78%

-9.16%

-14.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.45%

-8.15%

-6.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-3.28%

-7.03%

Volatility

PCLG vs. PCSG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCLGPCSGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.81%

36.53%

-18.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.81%

36.53%

-18.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.81%

36.53%

-18.72%

PCLG vs. PCSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PCSG's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCLG vs. PCSG - Dividend Comparison

PCLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while PCSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
PCLG
Polen Focus Growth ETF
0.04%0.03%
PCSG
Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCLG and PCSG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PCLG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PCLG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PCSG.

PCLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for PCSG.

PCLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PCSG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PCLG and 0.60% for PCSG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCLG and PCSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer