PCLG vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PCLG (Polen Focus Growth ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Polen, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. PCLG is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. PCLG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

PCLG vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLG achieves a -5.11% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.35% return.

PCLG

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: 4.45%
• YTD: -5.11%
• 6M: -5.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 2.35%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 4.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCLG vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF	-5.11%	-1.09%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.35%	0.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLG and IBIC is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	-0.16

Return for Risk

PCLG vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCLG vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCLG	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.97	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.51	3.49	-4.00

Drawdowns

PCLG vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLG drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLG and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCLG	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.78%	-0.90%	-22.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.27%	-0.15%	-9.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.67%	-0.10%	-9.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCLG	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.34%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.68%	0.90%	+16.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.68%	1.58%	+16.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.68%	1.58%	+16.10%

PCLG vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCLG vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

PCLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.59%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF	0.04%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCLG and IBIC in my portfolio?

PCLG and IBIC have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PCLG or IBIC?

On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCLG or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PCLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCLG or IBIC?

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.04% for PCLG.

What is the main difference between PCLG and IBIC?

PCLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Polen and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PCLG and 0.10% for IBIC.