PCLG vs. HYP
PCLG (Polen Focus Growth ETF) and HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCLG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HYP.
Performance
PCLG vs. HYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCLG achieves a -5.11% return, which is significantly lower than HYP's 34.38% return.
PCLG
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- -5.11%
- 6M
- -5.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYP
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- 11.72%
- YTD
- 34.38%
- 6M
- 33.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCLG vs. HYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF | -5.11% | -1.09% |
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 34.38% | -4.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCLG and HYP is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCLG vs. HYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCLG | HYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.51 | 1.04 | -1.56 |
Drawdowns
PCLG vs. HYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCLG drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, which is greater than HYP's maximum drawdown of -19.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLG and HYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCLG | HYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.78% | -19.58% | -4.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.27% | 0.00% | -9.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.67% | -6.48% | -3.19% |
Volatility
PCLG vs. HYP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCLG | HYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.68% | 41.02% | -23.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 41.02% | -23.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 41.02% | -23.34% |
PCLG vs. HYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCLG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HYP's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCLG vs. HYP - Dividend Comparison
PCLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than HYP's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 0.10% | 0.14% |
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCLG and HYP have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PCLG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PCLG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.
HYP has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.04% for PCLG.
They also come from different issuers: Polen and Golden Eagle. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PCLG and 0.85% for HYP.
Find the right allocation for PCLG and HYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer