PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCLG vs. HYP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCLG vs. HYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLG achieves a -5.11% return, which is significantly lower than HYP's 34.38% return.


PCLG

1D
-1.82%
1M
4.45%
YTD
-5.11%
6M
-5.23%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYP

1D
3.03%
1M
11.72%
YTD
34.38%
6M
33.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCLG vs. HYP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PCLG
Polen Focus Growth ETF
-5.11%-1.09%
HYP
Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF
34.38%-4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLG and HYP is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCLG vs. HYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PCLG vs. HYP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCLGHYPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.51

1.04

-1.56

Drawdowns

PCLG vs. HYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLG drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, which is greater than HYP's maximum drawdown of -19.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLG and HYP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCLGHYPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.78%

-19.58%

-4.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.27%

0.00%

-9.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.67%

-6.48%

-3.19%

Volatility

PCLG vs. HYP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCLGHYPDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.68%

41.02%

-23.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

41.02%

-23.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.68%

41.02%

-23.34%

PCLG vs. HYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HYP's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCLG vs. HYP - Dividend Comparison

PCLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than HYP's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025
HYP
Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF
0.10%0.14%
PCLG
Polen Focus Growth ETF
0.04%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCLG and HYP have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PCLG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PCLG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.

HYP has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.04% for PCLG.

They also come from different issuers: Polen and Golden Eagle. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PCLG and 0.85% for HYP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCLG and HYP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer