PCJSX vs. LTTIX

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

PCJSX (Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund) and LTTIX (MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, PCJSX returned 9.84%/yr vs 3.72%/yr for LTTIX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PCJSX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for LTTIX.

Performance

PCJSX vs. LTTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund (PCJSX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCJSX achieves a 7.66% return, which is significantly higher than LTTIX's 2.74% return.

PCJSX

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 2.17%
• YTD: 7.66%
• 6M: 7.73%
• 1Y: 19.74%
• 3Y*: 16.19%
• 5Y*: 9.84%
• 10Y*: —

LTTIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 2.74%
• 6M: 2.84%
• 1Y: 8.28%
• 3Y*: 8.33%
• 5Y*: 3.72%
• 10Y*: 6.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCJSX vs. LTTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PCJSX Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund	7.66%	14.05%	16.75%	23.50%	-16.15%	16.29%
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	2.74%	9.29%	6.73%	10.36%	-12.36%	8.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PCJSX and LTTIX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2021	0.85

The correlation between PCJSX and LTTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PCJSX vs. LTTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCJSX

PCJSX Risk / Return Rank: 35
PCJSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
PCJSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
PCJSX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
PCJSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
PCJSX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

LTTIX

LTTIX Risk / Return Rank: 63
LTTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
LTTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
LTTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
LTTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
LTTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCJSX vs. LTTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund (PCJSX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCJSX	LTTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	2.16	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	3.20	-0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.42	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	2.47	-0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.64	10.68	-2.04

PCJSX vs. LTTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCJSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the LTTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCJSX and LTTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCJSX vs. LTTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCJSX drawdown since its inception was -22.45%, which is greater than LTTIX's maximum drawdown of -19.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCJSX and LTTIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCJSX	LTTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.45%	-19.33%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.36%	-3.64%	-5.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.76%	-5.77%	-13.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.45%	-16.92%	-5.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-0.45%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.17%	-2.68%	-2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	0.84%	+1.45%

Volatility

PCJSX vs. LTTIX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund (PCJSX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) at 1.34%. This indicates that PCJSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCJSX	LTTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	1.34%	+3.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.18%	3.32%	+6.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.64%	4.18%	+8.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.03%	6.37%	+8.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.89%	7.24%	+7.65%

PCJSX vs. LTTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCJSX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than LTTIX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PCJSX vs. LTTIX - Dividend Comparison

PCJSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.53%, less than LTTIX's 11.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	11.54%	8.13%	7.07%	3.30%	5.88%	7.35%	2.83%	3.68%	4.32%	3.51%	4.03%	1.82%
PCJSX Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund	9.53%	10.26%	3.90%	1.39%	4.88%	5.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCJSX and LTTIX in my portfolio?

PCJSX and LTTIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCJSX or LTTIX?

PCJSX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to LTTIX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCJSX dropped -22.45% vs LTTIX's -19.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LTTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.