PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCJSX vs. ISOLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCJSX vs. ISOLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund (PCJSX) and Voya Target In-Retirement Fund (ISOLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCJSX achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly higher than ISOLX's 5.29% return.


PCJSX

1D
0.44%
1M
5.14%
YTD
8.21%
6M
7.66%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*

ISOLX

1D
0.17%
1M
2.40%
YTD
5.29%
6M
5.62%
1Y
13.99%
3Y*
10.19%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
5.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCJSX vs. ISOLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PCJSX
Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund
8.21%14.05%16.75%23.50%-16.15%16.29%
ISOLX
Voya Target In-Retirement Fund
5.29%11.96%7.03%11.13%-14.97%6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PCJSX and ISOLX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2021

0.80

The correlation between PCJSX and ISOLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCJSX vs. ISOLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCJSX
PCJSX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PCJSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCJSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCJSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PCJSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCJSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

ISOLX
ISOLX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ISOLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISOLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISOLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ISOLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISOLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCJSX vs. ISOLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund (PCJSX) and Voya Target In-Retirement Fund (ISOLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCJSXISOLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.55

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

3.39

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.12

15.49

-6.37

PCJSX vs. ISOLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCJSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the ISOLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCJSX and ISOLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCJSXISOLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

2.76

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.63

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.90

-0.17

Drawdowns

PCJSX vs. ISOLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCJSX drawdown since its inception was -22.45%, which is greater than ISOLX's maximum drawdown of -19.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCJSX and ISOLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCJSXISOLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.45%

-19.02%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-4.54%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.76%

-6.37%

-13.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.45%

-19.02%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-2.82%

-2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

0.96%

+1.29%

Volatility

PCJSX vs. ISOLX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund (PCJSX) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to Voya Target In-Retirement Fund (ISOLX) at 2.04%. This indicates that PCJSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISOLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCJSXISOLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

2.04%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.28%

4.51%

+4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

5.59%

+6.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

7.02%

+7.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.83%

6.58%

+8.25%

PCJSX vs. ISOLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCJSX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ISOLX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PCJSX vs. ISOLX - Dividend Comparison

PCJSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.48%, more than ISOLX's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISOLX
Voya Target In-Retirement Fund
3.69%3.89%2.37%3.10%3.50%10.09%3.54%6.63%3.53%4.60%2.06%0.30%
PCJSX
Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund
9.48%10.26%3.90%1.39%4.88%5.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCJSX and ISOLX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCJSX has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to ISOLX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCJSX dropped -22.45% vs ISOLX's -19.02%.

ISOLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCJSX and ISOLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer