PortfoliosLab logo
LTTIX vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LTTIX and VOO is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

LTTIX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LTTIX:

1.42

VOO:

0.74

Sortino Ratio

LTTIX:

1.88

VOO:

1.04

Omega Ratio

LTTIX:

1.26

VOO:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

LTTIX:

1.64

VOO:

0.68

Martin Ratio

LTTIX:

6.37

VOO:

2.58

Ulcer Index

LTTIX:

1.15%

VOO:

4.93%

Daily Std Dev

LTTIX:

5.46%

VOO:

19.54%

Max Drawdown

LTTIX:

-19.33%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

LTTIX:

0.00%

VOO:

-3.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTTIX achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, LTTIX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 5.40%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.81% annualized return.


LTTIX

YTD

3.01%

1M

1.37%

6M

1.07%

1Y

7.70%

3Y*

5.03%

5Y*

5.48%

10Y*

5.40%

VOO

YTD

0.90%

1M

6.28%

6M

-1.46%

1Y

14.27%

3Y*

14.31%

5Y*

15.89%

10Y*

12.81%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

LTTIX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTTIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LTTIX vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTTIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LTTIX is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LTTIX is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LTTIX is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LTTIX is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LTTIX is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LTTIX is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LTTIX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LTTIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTTIX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LTTIX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

LTTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.87%, more than VOO's 1.29% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
6.87%7.07%3.30%5.88%7.35%2.84%3.68%4.33%3.52%4.03%3.27%2.53%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.29%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

LTTIX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTTIX drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTTIX and VOO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LTTIX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) is 1.31%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that LTTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...