LTTIX vs. MEIIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LTTIX (MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund) and MEIIX (MFS Value Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - LTTIX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by MFS, while MEIIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by MFS. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LTTIX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MEIIX.

Performance

LTTIX vs. MEIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LTTIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

MEIIX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 1.21%
• 6M: 6.98%
• YTD: 10.50%
• 1Y: 18.81%
• 3Y*: 13.09%
• 5Y*: 8.73%
• 10Y*: 10.16%
• ALL TIME*: 9.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MEIIX MFS Value Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LTTIX vs. MEIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	2.74%	9.29%	6.73%	10.36%	-12.36%	8.61%	10.61%	17.82%	-3.97%	13.16%
MEIIX MFS Value Fund Class I	10.50%	13.26%	11.86%	8.21%	-6.02%	25.43%	3.99%	30.04%	-9.90%	17.20%

Correlation

The correlation between LTTIX and MEIIX is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between LTTIX and MEIIX has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LTTIX vs. MEIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LTTIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MEIIX

MEIIX Risk / Return Rank: 69
MEIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
MEIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
MEIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MEIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
MEIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LTTIX vs. MEIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTTIX	MEIIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.55	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.24	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.42	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.50	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	LTTIX	MEIIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-52.64%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.76%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.04%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-6.52%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.93%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LTTIX	MEIIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.76%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.49%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	10.58%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	13.89%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	16.48%	—

LTTIX vs. MEIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTTIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MEIIX's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTTIX vs. MEIIX - Dividend Comparison

LTTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, more than MEIIX's 8.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	11.54%	8.13%	7.07%	3.30%	5.88%	7.35%	2.83%	3.68%	4.32%	3.51%	4.03%	1.82%
MEIIX MFS Value Fund Class I	8.76%	9.52%	9.30%	8.41%	7.58%	3.32%	2.63%	3.17%	3.62%	4.04%	2.91%	5.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTTIX and MEIIX in my portfolio?

LTTIX and MEIIX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.