PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCJSX vs. PTDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCJSX vs. PTDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund (PCJSX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PCJSX having a 8.21% return and PTDIX slightly lower at 7.80%.


PCJSX

1D
0.44%
1M
5.14%
YTD
8.21%
6M
7.66%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*

PTDIX

1D
0.34%
1M
3.88%
YTD
7.80%
6M
8.09%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCJSX vs. PTDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PCJSX
Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund
8.21%14.05%16.75%23.50%-16.15%16.29%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
7.80%15.59%17.43%18.33%-18.13%13.53%

Correlation

The correlation between PCJSX and PTDIX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2021

0.96

The correlation between PCJSX and PTDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCJSX vs. PTDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCJSX
PCJSX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PCJSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCJSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCJSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PCJSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCJSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

PTDIX
PTDIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PTDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PTDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCJSX vs. PTDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund (PCJSX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCJSXPTDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.68

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.12

11.94

-2.82

PCJSX vs. PTDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCJSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the PTDIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCJSX and PTDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCJSXPTDIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

2.00

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.62

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.48

+0.25

Drawdowns

PCJSX vs. PTDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCJSX drawdown since its inception was -22.45%, smaller than the maximum PTDIX drawdown of -54.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCJSX and PTDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCJSXPTDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.45%

-54.38%

+31.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-7.32%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.76%

-13.05%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.45%

-25.43%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-7.49%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

1.64%

+0.61%

Volatility

PCJSX vs. PTDIX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund (PCJSX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX) have volatilities of 3.03% and 2.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCJSXPTDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

2.89%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.28%

7.85%

+1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

9.81%

+2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

13.49%

+1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.83%

13.83%

+1.00%

PCJSX vs. PTDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCJSX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than PTDIX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PCJSX vs. PTDIX - Dividend Comparison

PCJSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.48%, more than PTDIX's 9.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCJSX
Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund
9.48%10.26%3.90%1.39%4.88%5.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
9.09%9.80%12.28%4.40%8.61%8.92%6.01%7.26%9.28%6.07%4.86%6.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, PCJSX and PTDIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PCJSX has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to PTDIX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCJSX dropped -22.45% vs PTDIX's -54.38%.

PTDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCJSX and PTDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer