PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCJSX vs. FRAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCJSX vs. FRAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund (PCJSX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCJSX achieves a 7.66% return, which is significantly lower than FRAMX's 1,644,791.35% return.


PCJSX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.49%
YTD
7.66%
6M
6.96%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*

FRAMX

1D
0.00%
1M
1,599,541.56%
YTD
1,644,791.35%
6M
1,644,517.81%
1Y
1,729,686.80%
3Y*
2,590.99%
5Y*
609.45%
10Y*
173.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCJSX vs. FRAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PCJSX
Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund
7.66%14.05%16.75%23.50%-16.15%16.29%
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
1,644,791.35%9.55%4.04%7.80%-11.87%2.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PCJSX and FRAMX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2021

0.68

The correlation between PCJSX and FRAMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (5 years) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCJSX vs. FRAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCJSX
PCJSX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PCJSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCJSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCJSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PCJSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCJSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FRAMX
FRAMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FRAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FRAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCJSX vs. FRAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund (PCJSX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCJSXFRAMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-548,103.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

76,384.47

-76,383.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

523,435.99

-523,433.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

2,185,767.38

-2,185,758.66

PCJSX vs. FRAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCJSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the FRAMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCJSX and FRAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCJSX vs. FRAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCJSX drawdown since its inception was -22.45%, smaller than the maximum FRAMX drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCJSX and FRAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCJSXFRAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.45%

-33.94%

+11.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-3.45%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.76%

-5.02%

-14.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.45%

-16.31%

-6.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

0.00%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-3.82%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

0.82%

+1.47%

Volatility

PCJSX vs. FRAMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund (PCJSX) is 4.82%, while Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) has a volatility of 967.33%. This indicates that PCJSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCJSXFRAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

967.33%

-962.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

967.35%

-957.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

1,592,536.58%

-1,592,523.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

712,487.94%

-712,472.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.89%

503,504.00%

-503,489.11%

PCJSX vs. FRAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCJSX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FRAMX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCJSX vs. FRAMX - Dividend Comparison

PCJSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.53%, less than FRAMX's 102.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
102.97%2.77%2.77%2.58%4.26%3.31%2.23%2.37%4.40%8.26%1.42%1.42%
PCJSX
Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund
9.53%10.26%3.90%1.39%4.88%5.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCJSX and FRAMX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRAMX has higher volatility (967.33%) compared to PCJSX (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCJSX dropped -22.45% vs FRAMX's -33.94%.

PCJSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCJSX and FRAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer