PCIG vs. BPH

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PCIG (Polen Capital International Growth ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCIG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Polen, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. PCIG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

PCIG vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen Capital International Growth ETF (PCIG) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PCIG

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 0.75%
• 6M: -9.74%
• YTD: -4.99%
• 1Y: -10.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: 4.41%
• 1M: -3.74%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCIG vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PCIG Polen Capital International Growth ETF	2.85%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PCIG and BPH is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.17

PCIG vs. BPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PCIG	BPH
Technology	23.3%	-
Financial Services	8.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	-
Communication Services	5.8%	-
Energy	5.7%	100.0%
Basic Materials	4.6%	-
Healthcare	3.4%	-
Industrials	2.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PCIG vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCIG

PCIG Risk / Return Rank: 5
PCIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PCIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
PCIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PCIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PCIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCIG vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Capital International Growth ETF (PCIG) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCIG	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.47	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.01	—	—

Drawdowns

PCIG vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCIG drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCIG and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCIG	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.40%	-15.58%	-7.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.01%	-6.41%	-7.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.40%	-6.77%	-0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.97%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCIG	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.73%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.02%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.42%	28.88%	-9.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.31%	28.88%	-10.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.31%	28.88%	-10.57%

PCIG vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCIG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCIG vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

PCIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than BPH's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%
PCIG Polen Capital International Growth ETF	0.15%	0.14%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCIG and BPH in my portfolio?

PCIG and BPH have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PCIG or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCIG or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PCIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCIG or BPH?

BPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.15% for PCIG.

What is the main difference between PCIG and BPH?

PCIG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Polen and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PCIG and 0.19% for BPH.