PCGTX vs. BIMSX
Compare and contrast key facts about PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX).
PCGTX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 24, 1995. BIMSX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Sep 29, 2000.
Performance
PCGTX vs. BIMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCGTX vs. BIMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments | 2.45% | 7.84% | 0.98% | 5.12% | -13.48% | -0.61% | 5.75% | 6.55% | 0.17% | 2.83% |
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.32% | 6.76% | 3.21% | 5.53% | -8.88% | -1.68% | 7.16% | 6.83% | 0.30% | 2.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCGTX achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly higher than BIMSX's -0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PCGTX has underperformed BIMSX with an annualized return of 1.61%, while BIMSX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.02% annualized return.
PCGTX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 4.22%
- 1Y
- 7.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
BIMSX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCGTX vs. BIMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCGTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than BIMSX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCGTX vs. BIMSX — Risk / Return Rank
PCGTX
BIMSX
PCGTX vs. BIMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCGTX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 1.50 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | 2.23 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 2.43 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | 9.20 | -2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCGTX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.50 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.30 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.63 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 1.09 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCGTX and BIMSX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PCGTX vs. BIMSX - Dividend Comparison
PCGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than BIMSX's 3.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments | 4.44% | 3.78% | 5.36% | 5.02% | 3.67% | 2.87% | 3.23% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 2.96% | 2.71% | 2.21% |
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.56% | 3.50% | 3.44% | 2.81% | 1.81% | 1.90% | 3.08% | 2.16% | 2.14% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
PCGTX vs. BIMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCGTX drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, which is greater than BIMSX's maximum drawdown of -13.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGTX and BIMSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCGTX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.34% | -13.07% | -6.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | -1.87% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.20% | -13.00% | -6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.34% | -13.07% | -6.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -1.48% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -1.59% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 0.49% | +0.60% |
Volatility
PCGTX vs. BIMSX - Volatility Comparison
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a higher volatility of 2.13% compared to Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) at 1.05%. This indicates that PCGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCGTX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.13% | 1.05% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.13% | 1.67% | +2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.23% | 2.80% | +3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.10% | 3.86% | +3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.35% | 3.24% | +2.11% |