PCGG vs. INFL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL).

PCGG and INFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PCGG is an actively managed fund by Polen. It was launched on Aug 29, 2023. INFL is an actively managed fund by Horizon Kinetics LLC. It was launched on Jan 11, 2021.

Performance

PCGG vs. INFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PCGG vs. INFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF	-16.12%	1.62%	12.40%	4.01%
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF	17.28%	18.30%	23.34%	-0.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCGG achieves a -16.12% return, which is significantly lower than INFL's 17.28% return.

PCGG

• 1D: 2.93%
• 1M: -7.21%
• YTD: -16.12%
• 6M: -18.32%
• 1Y: -9.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INFL

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: -4.31%
• YTD: 17.28%
• 6M: 16.92%
• 1Y: 29.44%
• 3Y*: 20.97%
• 5Y*: 15.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCGG vs. INFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PCGG and INFL have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

PCGG

Polen Capital Global Growth ETF

INFL

Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF

Return for Risk

PCGG vs. INFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCGG

PCGG Risk / Return Rank: 3
PCGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
PCGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
PCGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
PCGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PCGG Martin Ratio Rank: 2

INFL

INFL Risk / Return Rank: 82
INFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
INFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
INFL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
INFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
INFL Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCGG vs. INFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCGG	INFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.50	1.51	-2.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.61	1.99	-2.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.30	-0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	2.32	-2.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.37	9.88	-11.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCGG vs. INFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCGG Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the INFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCGG and INFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCGG	INFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.50	1.51	-2.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	0.94	-0.95

Correlation

The correlation between PCGG and INFL is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PCGG vs. INFL - Dividend Comparison

PCGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF	0.91%	1.26%	1.77%	1.60%	1.65%	0.91%

Drawdowns

PCGG vs. INFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCGG drawdown since its inception was -22.66%, which is greater than INFL's maximum drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGG and INFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCGG	INFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.66%	-21.30%	-1.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.66%	-12.89%	-9.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.32%	-5.46%	-14.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.35%	-5.14%	+0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.21%	3.02%	+4.19%

Volatility

PCGG vs. INFL - Volatility Comparison

Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) at 5.86%. This indicates that PCGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCGG	INFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.31%	5.86%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.66%	13.54%	-1.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.79%	19.55%	+0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.64%	17.71%	-1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.64%	17.78%	-1.14%