PCFAX vs. SSCVX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PCFAX (PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund) and SSCVX (Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PCFAX returned 12.95%/yr vs 10.20%/yr for SSCVX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PCFAX charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for SSCVX.

Performance

PCFAX vs. SSCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) and Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCFAX achieves a 18.55% return, which is significantly lower than SSCVX's 27.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PCFAX has outperformed SSCVX with an annualized return of 12.95%, while SSCVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.20% annualized return.

PCFAX

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -0.71%
• 6M: 13.17%
• YTD: 18.55%
• 1Y: 35.72%
• 3Y*: 17.87%
• 5Y*: 10.48%
• 10Y*: 12.95%
• ALL TIME*: 10.56%

SSCVX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 0.95%
• 6M: 17.98%
• YTD: 27.88%
• 1Y: 40.56%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: 9.06%
• 10Y*: 10.20%
• ALL TIME*: 7.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PCFAX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SSCVX Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PCFAX vs. SSCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCFAX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund	18.55%	6.44%	20.44%	17.64%	-12.75%	38.96%	9.25%	21.17%	-12.42%	12.52%
SSCVX Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund	27.88%	5.46%	12.33%	12.47%	-15.35%	31.25%	9.61%	18.76%	-13.70%	12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PCFAX and SSCVX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2014	0.91

The correlation between PCFAX and SSCVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCFAX vs. SSCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PCFAX

PCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 82
PCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
PCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
PCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
PCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
PCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

SSCVX

SSCVX Risk / Return Rank: 90
SSCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
SSCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SSCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
SSCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SSCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PCFAX vs. SSCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) and Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCFAX	SSCVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	2.26	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	3.26	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.40	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.81	4.94	-1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.53	15.72	-3.19

PCFAX vs. SSCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the SSCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCFAX and SSCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCFAX vs. SSCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCFAX drawdown since its inception was -52.29%, smaller than the maximum SSCVX drawdown of -65.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCFAX and SSCVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCFAX	SSCVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.29%	-65.34%	+13.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.94%	-7.88%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.18%	-29.22%	+1.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.91%	-29.22%	+0.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.29%	-48.87%	-3.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.40%	0.00%	-2.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.01%	-11.79%	+2.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	2.51%	+0.20%

Volatility

PCFAX vs. SSCVX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) at 3.32%. This indicates that PCFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCFAX	SSCVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.90%	3.32%	+0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.48%	11.93%	+0.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.65%	17.26%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.84%	21.04%	+1.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.82%	23.35%	+1.47%

PCFAX vs. SSCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCFAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCVX's 1.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCFAX vs. SSCVX - Dividend Comparison

PCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than SSCVX's 8.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCFAX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund	4.14%	2.26%	6.30%	1.99%	13.66%	235.35%	18.04%	2.29%	12.48%	8.98%	0.00%	26.20%
SSCVX Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund	8.57%	10.96%	20.45%	6.56%	4.62%	6.64%	6.45%	0.12%	7.59%	13.50%	6.18%	12.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCFAX and SSCVX in my portfolio?

PCFAX and SSCVX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCFAX or SSCVX?

PCFAX has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to SSCVX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCFAX dropped -52.29% vs SSCVX's -65.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.