PCFAX vs. FCPVX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PCFAX (PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund) and FCPVX (Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PCFAX returned 13.53%/yr vs 11.66%/yr for FCPVX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PCFAX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for FCPVX.

Performance

PCFAX vs. FCPVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCFAX achieves a 19.16% return, which is significantly lower than FCPVX's 23.50% return. Over the past 10 years, PCFAX has outperformed FCPVX with an annualized return of 13.53%, while FCPVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.66% annualized return.

PCFAX

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 5.73%
• YTD: 19.16%
• 6M: 16.22%
• 1Y: 40.05%
• 3Y*: 21.51%
• 5Y*: 9.71%
• 10Y*: 13.53%

FCPVX

• 1D: 1.94%
• 1M: 5.15%
• YTD: 23.50%
• 6M: 20.75%
• 1Y: 40.59%
• 3Y*: 17.77%
• 5Y*: 10.41%
• 10Y*: 11.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCFAX vs. FCPVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCFAX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund	19.16%	6.44%	20.44%	17.64%	-12.75%	38.96%	9.25%	21.17%	-12.42%	12.52%
FCPVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund	23.50%	8.13%	9.41%	17.77%	-13.07%	38.08%	11.18%	20.86%	-15.47%	12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PCFAX and FCPVX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2014	0.93

The correlation between PCFAX and FCPVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PCFAX vs. FCPVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCFAX

PCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 73
PCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
PCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
PCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
PCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
PCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

FCPVX

FCPVX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FCPVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FCPVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FCPVX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FCPVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FCPVX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCFAX vs. FCPVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCFAX	FCPVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	2.24	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	3.28	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.38	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.50	3.95	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.53	13.85	+0.68

PCFAX vs. FCPVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the FCPVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCFAX and FCPVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCFAX vs. FCPVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCFAX drawdown since its inception was -52.29%, smaller than the maximum FCPVX drawdown of -57.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCFAX and FCPVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCFAX	FCPVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.29%	-57.65%	+5.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.94%	-10.31%	+1.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.18%	-23.81%	-4.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.91%	-23.81%	-5.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.29%	-44.59%	-7.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.90%	0.00%	-1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.08%	-7.95%	-1.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	2.94%	-0.18%

Volatility

PCFAX vs. FCPVX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) have volatilities of 5.96% and 6.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCFAX	FCPVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.96%	6.14%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.84%	13.38%	-0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.07%	18.19%	-0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.17%	21.00%	+2.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.90%	22.40%	+2.50%

PCFAX vs. FCPVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCFAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FCPVX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCFAX vs. FCPVX - Dividend Comparison

PCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than FCPVX's 8.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCPVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund	8.22%	10.15%	6.13%	5.20%	5.92%	7.95%	0.46%	3.49%	36.44%	3.64%	7.12%	11.09%
PCFAX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund	4.12%	2.26%	6.30%	1.99%	13.66%	235.35%	18.04%	2.29%	12.48%	8.98%	0.00%	26.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCFAX and FCPVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, PCFAX and FCPVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PCFAX or FCPVX?

FCPVX has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to PCFAX (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCFAX dropped -52.29% vs FCPVX's -57.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCPVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.