PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCEF vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCEF vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCEF achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, PCEF has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 7.33%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


PCEF

1D
-0.74%
1M
2.15%
YTD
4.88%
6M
5.42%
1Y
14.12%
3Y*
13.61%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*
7.33%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCEF vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
4.88%12.59%16.70%9.39%-18.66%15.38%4.61%24.08%-8.88%14.48%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PCEF and VOO is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.74

The correlation between PCEF and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

PCEF vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PCEF
VOO

Financial Services

37.2%
11.6%

Technology

22.0%
35.7%

Communication Services

7.0%
11.3%

Healthcare

6.7%
8.5%

Industrials

6.5%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
10.2%

Energy

4.2%
3.5%

Utilities

3.5%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
4.9%

Basic Materials

2.8%
1.8%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.9%

Financial Services

PCEF
37.2%
VOO
11.6%

Technology

PCEF
22.0%
VOO
35.7%

Communication Services

PCEF
7.0%
VOO
11.3%

Healthcare

PCEF
6.7%
VOO
8.5%

Industrials

PCEF
6.5%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PCEF
6.0%
VOO
10.2%

Energy

PCEF
4.2%
VOO
3.5%

Utilities

PCEF
3.5%
VOO
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

PCEF
3.2%
VOO
4.9%

Basic Materials

PCEF
2.8%
VOO
1.8%

Real Estate

PCEF
0.9%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCEF vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCEF
PCEF Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
PCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCEF vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCEFVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.43

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

3.16

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

14.73

-6.73

PCEF vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCEF and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCEFVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.39

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.83

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.87

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.89

-0.32

Drawdowns

PCEF vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCEF drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCEF and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCEFVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.64%

-33.99%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-8.90%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.09%

-18.69%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.25%

-24.52%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.64%

-33.99%

-4.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.70%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-3.69%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

1.91%

-0.14%

Volatility

PCEF vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) is 2.50%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that PCEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCEFVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

2.84%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.30%

8.90%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.61%

11.80%

-3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.48%

16.81%

-5.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.29%

18.01%

-4.72%

PCEF vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCEF has a 2.71% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCEF vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

PCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
7.73%7.96%8.79%9.86%8.93%6.67%7.54%7.12%8.21%6.96%7.72%9.18%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCEF and VOO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to PCEF (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCEF dropped -38.64% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 7.33% for PCEF. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PCEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 7.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 2.71% for PCEF.

PCEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.73%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

PCEF is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VOO is S&P 500. PCEF tracks S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 2.71% for PCEF and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCEF and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer