PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PCEF vs. UTF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PCEF and UTF is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

PCEF vs. UTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
7.77%
4.68%
PCEF
UTF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PCEF:

2.03

UTF:

1.49

Sortino Ratio

PCEF:

2.70

UTF:

2.19

Omega Ratio

PCEF:

1.39

UTF:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

PCEF:

1.69

UTF:

1.37

Martin Ratio

PCEF:

11.29

UTF:

5.56

Ulcer Index

PCEF:

1.48%

UTF:

3.84%

Daily Std Dev

PCEF:

8.23%

UTF:

14.33%

Max Drawdown

PCEF:

-38.64%

UTF:

-72.62%

Current Drawdown

PCEF:

0.00%

UTF:

-5.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCEF achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly higher than UTF's 2.95% return. Over the past 10 years, PCEF has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 6.34%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.16% annualized return.


PCEF

YTD

4.53%

1M

1.87%

6M

7.77%

1Y

17.61%

5Y*

4.97%

10Y*

6.34%

UTF

YTD

2.95%

1M

0.64%

6M

4.68%

1Y

21.55%

5Y*

5.53%

10Y*

9.16%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PCEF vs. UTF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCEF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PCEF is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PCEF is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PCEF is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PCEF is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PCEF is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PCEF is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

UTF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UTF is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UTF is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UTF is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UTF is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UTF is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UTF is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PCEF vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PCEF, currently valued at 2.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.031.49
The chart of Sortino ratio for PCEF, currently valued at 2.70, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.702.19
The chart of Omega ratio for PCEF, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.391.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for PCEF, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.691.37
The chart of Martin ratio for PCEF, currently valued at 11.29, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0011.295.56
PCEF
UTF

The current PCEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the UTF Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCEF and UTF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.03
1.49
PCEF
UTF

Dividends

PCEF vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison

PCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.72%, more than UTF's 7.61% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
7.72%8.79%9.85%8.93%6.67%7.55%7.12%8.21%6.96%7.12%9.18%8.03%
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
7.61%7.74%8.76%7.75%6.53%7.20%7.10%10.12%7.37%10.51%8.39%6.51%

Drawdowns

PCEF vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCEF drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCEF and UTF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
-5.02%
PCEF
UTF

Volatility

PCEF vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) is 1.72%, while Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that PCEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.72%
3.46%
PCEF
UTF
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab