PCEF vs. UTF
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF).
PCEF is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index. It was launched on Feb 19, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PCEF or UTF.
Correlation
The correlation between PCEF and UTF is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PCEF vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PCEF:
2.09
UTF:
1.31
PCEF:
2.76
UTF:
1.95
PCEF:
1.40
UTF:
1.23
PCEF:
1.48
UTF:
1.06
PCEF:
12.36
UTF:
6.51
PCEF:
1.39%
UTF:
2.99%
PCEF:
8.24%
UTF:
14.95%
PCEF:
-38.64%
UTF:
-72.62%
PCEF:
-2.69%
UTF:
-9.93%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCEF achieves a 16.88% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 19.48% return. Over the past 10 years, PCEF has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 6.06%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 8.50% annualized return.
PCEF
16.88%
-0.86%
8.00%
17.07%
4.79%
6.06%
UTF
19.48%
-8.40%
8.77%
19.43%
5.44%
8.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PCEF vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PCEF vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
PCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.78%, more than UTF's 7.93% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | 8.78% | 9.85% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 7.55% | 7.12% | 8.21% | 6.96% | 7.12% | 9.18% | 8.03% | 8.13% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 7.93% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% | 6.51% | 6.99% |
Drawdowns
PCEF vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCEF drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCEF and UTF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PCEF vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) is 2.80%, while Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that PCEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.