PCEF vs. CEFS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PCEF (Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF) and CEFS (Saba Closed-End Funds ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCEF is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index, while CEFS is a Event Driven fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. PCEF is passively managed, while CEFS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PCEF returned 4.64%/yr vs 14.29%/yr for CEFS. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PCEF charges 2.71%/yr vs 2.61%/yr for CEFS.

Performance

PCEF vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCEF achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's 15.16% return.

PCEF

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: 4.51%
• 6M: 4.88%
• 1Y: 13.23%
• 3Y*: 13.17%
• 5Y*: 4.64%
• 10Y*: 7.26%

CEFS

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 4.16%
• YTD: 15.16%
• 6M: 16.21%
• 1Y: 26.43%
• 3Y*: 22.09%
• 5Y*: 14.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCEF vs. CEFS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF	4.51%	12.59%	16.70%	9.39%	-18.66%	15.38%	4.61%	24.08%	-8.88%	4.56%
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	15.16%	16.67%	23.48%	20.99%	-7.08%	17.86%	3.40%	28.41%	-9.97%	7.92%

Correlation

The correlation between PCEF and CEFS is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017	0.63

The correlation between PCEF and CEFS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PCEF vs. CEFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCEF

PCEF Risk / Return Rank: 43
PCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
PCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
PCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 45
PCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
PCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 46

CEFS

CEFS Risk / Return Rank: 86
CEFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CEFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CEFS Omega Ratio Rank: 84
CEFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CEFS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCEF vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCEF	CEFS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.57	-1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	3.70	-1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.49	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	4.68	-3.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.39	17.98	-10.60

PCEF vs. CEFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the CEFS Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCEF and CEFS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCEF vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCEF drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, roughly equal to the maximum CEFS drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCEF and CEFS.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCEF	CEFS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.64%	-38.99%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.30%	-5.67%	-2.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.09%	-13.37%	-0.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.25%	-16.85%	-7.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.19%	-0.23%	-0.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.46%	-3.65%	-0.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	1.47%	+0.33%

Volatility

PCEF vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) is 2.92%, while Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that PCEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCEF	CEFS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	4.04%	-1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.56%	9.01%	-1.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.93%	10.34%	-1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.52%	13.16%	-1.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.31%	15.33%	-2.02%

PCEF vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCEF has a 2.71% expense ratio, which is higher than CEFS's 2.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCEF vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison

PCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, more than CEFS's 7.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	7.01%	7.84%	8.79%	9.20%	11.32%	10.73%	8.61%	8.10%	10.43%	5.02%	0.00%	0.00%
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF	7.75%	7.96%	8.79%	9.86%	8.93%	6.67%	7.54%	7.12%	8.21%	6.96%	7.72%	9.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCEF and CEFS in my portfolio?

PCEF and CEFS have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCEF or CEFS?

CEFS has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to PCEF (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCEF dropped -38.64% vs CEFS's -38.99%.

Which ETF is better, PCEF or CEFS?

On 5-year performance, CEFS leads with 14.29% vs 4.64% for PCEF. On fees, CEFS is cheaper at 2.61% per year. On volatility, PCEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PCEF or CEFS?

Over the 5-year period, CEFS has performed better with a 14.29% return vs 4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCEF or CEFS?

CEFS is cheaper with a 2.61% expense ratio, compared with 2.71% for PCEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCEF or CEFS?

PCEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.75%, compared with 7.01% for CEFS.

What is the main difference between PCEF and CEFS?

PCEF is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while CEFS is Event Driven. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 2.71% for PCEF and 2.61% for CEFS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.