PBUS vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. PBUS is passively managed, while GRW is actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBUS charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

PBUS vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PBUS

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 5.14%
• YTD: 10.82%
• 6M: 10.68%
• 1Y: 27.65%
• 3Y*: 22.61%
• 5Y*: 13.48%
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBUS vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF	0.01%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PBUS and GRW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.40

PBUS vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PBUS	GRW
Technology	35.4%	26.6%
Financial Services	11.6%	9.8%
Communication Services	11.3%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	8.3%
Healthcare	8.6%	4.1%
Industrials	8.6%	38.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	-
Energy	3.6%	-
Utilities	2.3%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	4.0%

Return for Risk

PBUS vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBUS

PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 68
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 69
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBUS vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBUS	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.93	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBUS	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	14.00	-13.20

Drawdowns

PBUS vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBUS drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBUS and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBUS	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.15%	-0.45%	-32.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-0.45%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.13%	-0.14%	-4.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PBUS	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.94%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.13%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.06%	10.19%	+1.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.05%	10.19%	+6.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.33%	10.19%	+9.14%

PBUS vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBUS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBUS vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

PBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF	0.98%	1.05%	1.20%	1.36%	1.71%	0.98%	1.35%	1.53%	2.33%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBUS and GRW in my portfolio?

PBUS and GRW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PBUS or GRW?

On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBUS or GRW?

PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBUS or GRW?

PBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between PBUS and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for PBUS and 0.75% for GRW.