PBQQ vs. QB
PBQQ (PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. PBQQ is actively managed, while QB is passively managed. Over the past year, PBQQ returned 15.21% vs 21.06% for QB. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PBQQ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.
Performance
PBQQ vs. QB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBQQ achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 13.84% return.
PBQQ
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 6.95%
- YTD
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 15.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.82%
QB
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 12.93%
- YTD
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $349.13K | $445.65K | $905.94K | |
| $58.82K | $37.73K | $149.66K |
PBQQ vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 7.67% | 8.99% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 13.84% | 6.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBQQ and QB is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.80 |
The correlation between PBQQ and QB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBQQ vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank
PBQQ
QB
PBQQ vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBQQ | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.66 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 5.83 | -2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.86 | 27.99 | -15.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBQQ vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBQQ drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -3.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBQQ and QB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBQQ | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.92% | -3.47% | -9.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.71% | -3.47% | -1.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | 0.00% | -1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -0.42% | -0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 0.72% | +0.39% |
Volatility
PBQQ vs. QB - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) at 2.32%. This indicates that PBQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBQQ | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 2.32% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.36% | 6.04% | +0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.81% | 7.27% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 7.01% | +4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 7.01% | +4.63% |
PBQQ vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBQQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBQQ vs. QB - Dividend Comparison
PBQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than QB's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 0.77% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBQQ and QB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBQQ has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to QB (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBQQ dropped -12.92% vs QB's -3.47%.
On 1-year performance, QB leads with 21.06% vs 15.21% for PBQQ. On fees, PBQQ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QB has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QB has performed better with a 21.06% return vs 15.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBQQ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QB.
QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.01% for PBQQ.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBQQ and 0.58% for QB.
QB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBQQ and QB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer