PBPNX vs. FFFCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PBPNX (PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund) and FFFCX (Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, PBPNX returned 8.59%/yr vs 5.84%/yr for FFFCX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBPNX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FFFCX.

Performance

PBPNX vs. FFFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund (PBPNX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBPNX achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly higher than FFFCX's 5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, PBPNX has outperformed FFFCX with an annualized return of 8.59%, while FFFCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.84% annualized return.

PBPNX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 3.20%
• YTD: 7.63%
• 6M: 7.89%
• 1Y: 19.14%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: 5.99%
• 10Y*: 8.59%

FFFCX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 5.33%
• 6M: 5.67%
• 1Y: 12.68%
• 3Y*: 9.08%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: 5.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBPNX vs. FFFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PBPNX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund	7.63%	15.13%	7.96%	14.66%	-17.47%	12.97%	14.28%	21.31%	-6.26%	17.05%
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund	5.33%	11.39%	5.26%	9.82%	-13.21%	5.64%	11.09%	14.34%	-3.74%	12.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PBPNX and FFFCX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.94

The correlation between PBPNX and FFFCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PBPNX vs. FFFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBPNX

PBPNX Risk / Return Rank: 72
PBPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PBPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
PBPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
PBPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PBPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FFFCX

FFFCX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FFFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FFFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FFFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FFFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FFFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBPNX vs. FFFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund (PBPNX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBPNX	FFFCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	2.59	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	3.75	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.53	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	3.20	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.65	13.95	-0.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PBPNX vs. FFFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBPNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the FFFCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBPNX and FFFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBPNX	FFFCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	2.59	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.58	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.93	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.68	+0.05

Drawdowns

PBPNX vs. FFFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBPNX drawdown since its inception was -24.09%, smaller than the maximum FFFCX drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBPNX and FFFCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBPNX	FFFCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.09%	-36.88%	+12.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.35%	-4.00%	-2.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.39%	-5.83%	-3.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.90%	-18.35%	-5.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.09%	-18.35%	-5.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-4.57%	+0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.42%	0.92%	+0.50%

Volatility

PBPNX vs. FFFCX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund (PBPNX) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) at 2.02%. This indicates that PBPNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBPNX	FFFCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.57%	2.02%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.13%	4.15%	+1.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.56%	4.95%	+2.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.16%	6.38%	+3.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.61%	6.30%	+4.31%

PBPNX vs. FFFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBPNX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFCX's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBPNX vs. FFFCX - Dividend Comparison

PBPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than FFFCX's 4.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund	4.66%	4.97%	2.99%	2.72%	7.23%	9.33%	6.01%	5.78%	6.98%	4.82%	3.22%	3.68%
PBPNX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund	3.68%	4.05%	4.02%	3.30%	3.84%	5.10%	3.21%	3.81%	4.68%	2.14%	3.11%	2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBPNX and FFFCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, PBPNX and FFFCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PBPNX or FFFCX?

PBPNX has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to FFFCX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBPNX dropped -24.09% vs FFFCX's -36.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.