PBPNX vs. FTLSX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PBPNX (PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund) and FTLSX (Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, PBPNX returned 5.96%/yr vs 3.52%/yr for FTLSX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBPNX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FTLSX.

Performance

PBPNX vs. FTLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund (PBPNX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBPNX achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly higher than FTLSX's 5.30% return.

PBPNX

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 1.32%
• YTD: 7.28%
• 6M: 7.33%
• 1Y: 18.09%
• 3Y*: 11.81%
• 5Y*: 5.96%
• 10Y*: 8.57%

FTLSX

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 1.35%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 5.45%
• 1Y: 11.51%
• 3Y*: 8.12%
• 5Y*: 3.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBPNX vs. FTLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PBPNX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund	7.28%	15.13%	7.96%	14.66%	-17.47%	12.97%	14.28%	21.31%	-6.26%	8.01%
FTLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund	5.30%	10.31%	4.72%	8.60%	-11.33%	3.30%	9.04%	10.97%	-1.40%	3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between PBPNX and FTLSX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017	0.83

The correlation between PBPNX and FTLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PBPNX vs. FTLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBPNX

PBPNX Risk / Return Rank: 68
PBPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
PBPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
PBPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
PBPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
PBPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

FTLSX

FTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBPNX vs. FTLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund (PBPNX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBPNX	FTLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.36	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.45	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.49	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	3.18	-0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.41	13.71	-1.30

PBPNX vs. FTLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBPNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the FTLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBPNX and FTLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBPNX vs. FTLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBPNX drawdown since its inception was -24.09%, which is greater than FTLSX's maximum drawdown of -15.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBPNX and FTLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBPNX	FTLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.09%	-15.74%	-8.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.35%	-3.65%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.39%	-4.83%	-4.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.90%	-15.74%	-8.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	0.00%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.35%	-2.80%	-1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.44%	0.84%	+0.60%

Volatility

PBPNX vs. FTLSX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund (PBPNX) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) at 2.31%. This indicates that PBPNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBPNX	FTLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.21%	2.31%	+0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.69%	4.25%	+2.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.02%	4.92%	+3.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.22%	5.50%	+4.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.63%	4.81%	+5.82%

PBPNX vs. FTLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBPNX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FTLSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PBPNX vs. FTLSX - Dividend Comparison

PBPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than FTLSX's 3.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund	3.51%	3.68%	3.37%	3.19%	5.28%	4.91%	3.06%	4.44%	4.26%	1.97%	0.00%	0.00%
PBPNX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund	4.72%	4.05%	4.02%	3.30%	3.84%	5.10%	3.21%	3.81%	4.68%	2.14%	3.11%	2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBPNX and FTLSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, PBPNX and FTLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PBPNX or FTLSX?

PBPNX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to FTLSX (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBPNX dropped -24.09% vs FTLSX's -15.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.