PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBJ vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBJ vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBJ achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, PBJ has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 5.27%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.


PBJ

1D
-0.35%
1M
-4.27%
YTD
6.38%
6M
5.80%
1Y
0.42%
3Y*
2.79%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
5.27%

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBJ vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBJ
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF
6.38%-1.86%2.49%2.31%3.14%26.88%5.53%17.50%-11.21%1.87%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PBJ and QQQ is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2005

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between PBJ and QQQ has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PBJ vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PBJ
QQQ

Consumer Defensive

85.6%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
12.3%

Basic Materials

5.2%
1.1%

Industrials

3.1%
2.8%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Consumer Defensive

PBJ
85.6%
QQQ
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PBJ
6.0%
QQQ
12.3%

Basic Materials

PBJ
5.2%
QQQ
1.1%

Industrials

PBJ
3.1%
QQQ
2.8%

Financial Services

PBJ
0.2%
QQQ
0.2%

Communication Services

PBJ

-

QQQ
15.8%

Energy

PBJ

-

QQQ
0.6%

Healthcare

PBJ

-

QQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

PBJ

-

QQQ
0.1%

Technology

PBJ

-

QQQ
53.8%

Utilities

PBJ

-

QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBJ vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBJ
PBJ Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PBJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBJ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PBJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBJ Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBJ vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBJQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.03

2.64

-2.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.13

3.45

-3.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.45

-0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

3.51

-3.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.08

13.49

-13.41

PBJ vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBJ and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBJQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

2.64

-2.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.81

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.99

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.41

+0.05

Drawdowns

PBJ vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBJ drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBJ and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBJQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.15%

-82.97%

+43.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-11.96%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-22.77%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.81%

-35.12%

+19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.49%

-35.12%

+6.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.48%

-0.26%

-6.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-32.79%

+27.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.22%

3.11%

+2.11%

Volatility

PBJ vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) is 3.74%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that PBJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBJQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

4.49%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.80%

12.10%

-3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48%

15.94%

-3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.75%

22.38%

-8.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.11%

22.29%

-7.18%

PBJ vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBJ vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

PBJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBJ
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF
1.58%1.83%1.11%1.81%1.82%0.90%1.12%1.21%1.41%0.70%1.56%1.24%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBJ and QQQ have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to PBJ (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBJ dropped -39.15% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.94% vs 5.27% for PBJ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, PBJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.94% return vs 5.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PBJ.

PBJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

PBJ is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. PBJ tracks Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PBJ and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBJ and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer