PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBJ vs. FXG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBJ vs. FXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBJ achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly higher than FXG's -0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PBJ has outperformed FXG with an annualized return of 5.27%, while FXG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.23% annualized return.


PBJ

1D
-0.35%
1M
-4.27%
YTD
6.38%
6M
5.80%
1Y
0.42%
3Y*
2.79%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
5.27%

FXG

1D
0.06%
1M
-5.27%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
-1.44%
1Y
-2.29%
3Y*
0.94%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
4.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBJ vs. FXG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBJ
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF
6.38%-1.86%2.49%2.31%3.14%26.88%5.53%17.50%-11.21%1.87%
FXG
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund
-0.18%-2.66%3.21%1.97%3.28%21.73%4.85%20.65%-11.49%7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PBJ and FXG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.82

The correlation between PBJ and FXG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

PBJ vs. FXG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PBJ
FXG

Consumer Defensive

85.6%
79.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
7.9%

Basic Materials

5.2%
2.0%

Industrials

3.1%
4.1%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

8.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

PBJ
85.6%
FXG
79.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PBJ
6.0%
FXG
7.9%

Basic Materials

PBJ
5.2%
FXG
2.0%

Industrials

PBJ
3.1%
FXG
4.1%

Financial Services

PBJ
0.2%
FXG

-

Communication Services

PBJ

-

FXG

-

Energy

PBJ

-

FXG

-

Healthcare

PBJ

-

FXG
8.2%

Real Estate

PBJ

-

FXG

-

Technology

PBJ

-

FXG

-

Utilities

PBJ

-

FXG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBJ vs. FXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBJ
PBJ Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PBJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBJ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PBJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBJ Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

FXG
FXG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBJ vs. FXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBJFXGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.98

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

-0.18

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.08

-0.42

+0.51

PBJ vs. FXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is higher than the FXG Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBJ and FXG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBJFXGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

-0.18

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.14

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.28

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.47

-0.01

Drawdowns

PBJ vs. FXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBJ drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, roughly equal to the maximum FXG drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBJ and FXG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBJFXGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.15%

-38.69%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-12.75%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-12.75%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.81%

-15.70%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.49%

-27.54%

-0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.48%

-12.70%

+6.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-6.03%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.22%

5.41%

-0.19%

Volatility

PBJ vs. FXG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) at 3.20%. This indicates that PBJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBJFXGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

3.20%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.80%

9.11%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48%

12.71%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.75%

13.48%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.11%

14.92%

+0.19%

PBJ vs. FXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PBJ and FXG have an expense ratio of 0.63%.


Dividends

PBJ vs. FXG - Dividend Comparison

PBJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than FXG's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXG
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund
2.90%2.83%1.70%1.41%1.83%1.38%1.41%1.63%2.31%1.34%1.72%1.67%
PBJ
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF
1.58%1.83%1.11%1.81%1.82%0.90%1.12%1.21%1.41%0.70%1.56%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBJ and FXG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBJ has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to FXG (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBJ dropped -39.15% vs FXG's -38.69%.

On 10-year performance, PBJ leads with 5.27% vs 4.23% for FXG. Both ETFs have the same 0.63% expense ratio. On volatility, FXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PBJ has performed better with a 5.27% return vs 4.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBJ and FXG have the same expense ratio: 0.63% per year.

FXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 1.58% for PBJ.

PBJ tracks Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index, while FXG tracks StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust.

PBJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBJ and FXG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer