PBJ vs. EATZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PBJ (Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBJ is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index, while EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. PBJ is passively managed, while EATZ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PBJ returned 3.14%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for EATZ. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBJ charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

PBJ vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBJ achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly higher than EATZ's 4.80% return.

PBJ

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -4.27%
• YTD: 6.38%
• 6M: 5.80%
• 1Y: 0.42%
• 3Y*: 2.79%
• 5Y*: 3.14%
• 10Y*: 5.27%

EATZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 4.80%
• 6M: 3.18%
• 1Y: -6.88%
• 3Y*: 10.53%
• 5Y*: 2.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBJ vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF	6.38%	-1.86%	2.49%	2.31%	3.14%	8.30%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PBJ and EATZ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021	0.51

The correlation between PBJ and EATZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PBJ vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PBJ	EATZ
Consumer Defensive	85.6%	16.9%
Consumer Cyclical	6.0%	78.2%
Basic Materials	5.2%	-
Industrials	3.1%	4.9%
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Communication Services	-	2.3%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PBJ vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBJ

PBJ Risk / Return Rank: 9
PBJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
PBJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
PBJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8
PBJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
PBJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9

EATZ

EATZ Risk / Return Rank: 10
EATZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Omega Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBJ vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBJ	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	0.10	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.13	0.28	-0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.03	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.03	0.08	-0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.08	0.14	-0.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PBJ vs. EATZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the EATZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBJ and EATZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBJ	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03	0.10	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.10	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.12	+0.34

Drawdowns

PBJ vs. EATZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBJ drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, which is greater than EATZ's maximum drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBJ and EATZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBJ	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.15%	-34.40%	-4.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.48%	-23.21%	+10.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.99%	-23.21%	+10.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.81%	-33.34%	+17.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.48%	-13.56%	+7.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.39%	-13.40%	+8.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.22%	12.82%	-7.60%

Volatility

PBJ vs. EATZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) is 3.74%, while AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that PBJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EATZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBJ	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	4.91%	-1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.80%	13.48%	-4.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.48%	18.81%	-6.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.75%	21.65%	-7.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.11%	21.60%	-6.49%

PBJ vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBJ vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

PBJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than EATZ's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF	1.58%	1.83%	1.11%	1.81%	1.82%	0.90%	1.12%	1.21%	1.41%	0.70%	1.56%	1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBJ and EATZ in my portfolio?

PBJ and EATZ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBJ or EATZ?

EATZ has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to PBJ (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBJ dropped -39.15% vs EATZ's -34.40%.

Which ETF is better, PBJ or EATZ?

On 5-year performance, PBJ leads with 3.14% vs 2.20% for EATZ. On fees, PBJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, PBJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PBJ or EATZ?

Over the 5-year period, PBJ has performed better with a 3.14% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBJ or EATZ?

PBJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBJ or EATZ?

PBJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.

What is the main difference between PBJ and EATZ?

PBJ is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while EATZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PBJ and 1.00% for EATZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EATZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.