PBEU vs. VFH
PBEU (Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - PBEU tracks the BITA European Banks Index while VFH tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBEU charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFH.
Performance
PBEU vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBEU achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's -0.29% return.
PBEU
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFH
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- -0.29%
- 6M
- -1.61%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- 13.51%
PBEU vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF | 13.63% | 11.42% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -0.29% | 6.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBEU and VFH is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBEU vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
PBEU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VFH
PBEU vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF (PBEU) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBEU | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.61 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBEU vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBEU drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBEU and VFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBEU | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.26% | -78.61% | +61.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -3.32% | +1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -18.51% | +14.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.67% | — |
Volatility
PBEU vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBEU | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.63% | 14.95% | +12.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.63% | 19.26% | +8.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.63% | 22.50% | +5.13% |
PBEU vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBEU has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PBEU vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
PBEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than VFH's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBEU and VFH have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for PBEU.
VFH has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.01% for PBEU.
PBEU tracks BITA European Banks Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Portfolio Building Block and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for PBEU and 0.09% for VFH.
Find the right allocation for PBEU and VFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer