PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBE vs. CNCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBE vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PBE

1D
2.04%
1M
2.68%
YTD
0.58%
6M
1.15%
1Y
30.26%
3Y*
10.44%
5Y*
3.06%
10Y*
7.55%

CNCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBE vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


PBE vs. CNCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PBE
CNCR

Healthcare

100.0%
96.6%

Financial Services

0.0%
3.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

PBE
100.0%
CNCR
96.6%

Financial Services

PBE
0.0%
CNCR
3.3%

Basic Materials

PBE

-

CNCR

-

Communication Services

PBE

-

CNCR

-

Consumer Cyclical

PBE

-

CNCR

-

Consumer Defensive

PBE

-

CNCR

-

Energy

PBE

-

CNCR

-

Industrials

PBE

-

CNCR

-

Real Estate

PBE

-

CNCR

-

Technology

PBE

-

CNCR

-

Utilities

PBE

-

CNCR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBE vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBE
PBE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

CNCR
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBE vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBECNCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.27

PBE vs. CNCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBECNCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

Drawdowns

PBE vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBE drawdown since its inception was -45.69%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBE and CNCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBECNCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.69%

0.00%

-45.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.62%

0.00%

-3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.24%

0.00%

-16.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

Volatility

PBE vs. CNCR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBECNCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.71%

0.00%

+18.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.54%

0.00%

+22.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.92%

0.00%

+24.92%

PBE vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBE vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison

PBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNCR
Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBE
Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF
1.05%1.00%0.05%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.57%0.38%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, PBE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.

PBE has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.

PBE tracks Dynamic Biotech & Genome Intellidex Index (AMEX), while CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PBE and 0.79% for CNCR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBE and CNCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer