PBE vs. CNCR
PBE (Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF) and CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - PBE tracks the Dynamic Biotech & Genome Intellidex Index (AMEX) while CNCR tracks the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. Both are passively managed. PBE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CNCR.
Performance
PBE vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PBE
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 30.26%
- 3Y*
- 10.44%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 7.55%
CNCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBE vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PBE Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF | -1.13% |
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% |
PBE vs. CNCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBE
CNCR
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PBE
CNCR
Financial Services
PBE
CNCR
Basic Materials
PBE
-
CNCR
-
Communication Services
PBE
-
CNCR
-
Consumer Cyclical
PBE
-
CNCR
-
Consumer Defensive
PBE
-
CNCR
-
Energy
PBE
-
CNCR
-
Industrials
PBE
-
CNCR
-
Real Estate
PBE
-
CNCR
-
Technology
PBE
-
CNCR
-
Utilities
PBE
-
CNCR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBE vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank
PBE
CNCR
PBE vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBE | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBE | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PBE vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBE drawdown since its inception was -45.69%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBE and CNCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBE | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.69% | 0.00% | -45.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.62% | 0.00% | -3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.24% | 0.00% | -16.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | — | — |
Volatility
PBE vs. CNCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBE | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.71% | 0.00% | +18.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 0.00% | +22.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.92% | 0.00% | +24.92% |
PBE vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBE vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison
PBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBE Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF | 1.05% | 1.00% | 0.05% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.57% | 0.38% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, PBE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.
PBE has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.
PBE tracks Dynamic Biotech & Genome Intellidex Index (AMEX), while CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PBE and 0.79% for CNCR.
Find the right allocation for PBE and CNCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer