CNCR vs. SCHD
CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNCR is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. CNCR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
CNCR vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CNCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
CNCR vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 4.26% |
CNCR vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CNCR
SCHD
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
CNCR
SCHD
Financial Services
CNCR
SCHD
Basic Materials
CNCR
-
SCHD
Communication Services
CNCR
-
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
CNCR
-
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
CNCR
-
SCHD
Energy
CNCR
-
SCHD
Industrials
CNCR
-
SCHD
Real Estate
CNCR
-
SCHD
-
Technology
CNCR
-
SCHD
Utilities
CNCR
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNCR vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
CNCR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHD
CNCR vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNCR | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.35 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNCR vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNCR drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCR and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNCR | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -33.37% | +33.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.47% | +2.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -3.31% | +3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.90% | — |
Volatility
CNCR vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNCR | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 11.07% | -11.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 14.36% | -14.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 16.71% | -16.71% |
CNCR vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNCR vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.
CNCR is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CNCR and 0.06% for SCHD.
Find the right allocation for CNCR and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer