CNCR vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
CNCR and SMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNCR is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2015. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both CNCR and SMH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNCR or SMH.
Correlation
The correlation between CNCR and SMH is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CNCR vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CNCR:
-0.65
SMH:
0.78
CNCR:
-0.78
SMH:
1.22
CNCR:
0.92
SMH:
1.16
CNCR:
-0.35
SMH:
1.14
CNCR:
-1.14
SMH:
2.62
CNCR:
20.19%
SMH:
10.81%
CNCR:
35.59%
SMH:
36.15%
CNCR:
-72.14%
SMH:
-83.29%
CNCR:
-62.11%
SMH:
-7.94%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNCR achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 6.45% return.
CNCR
2.11%
3.71%
-14.95%
-20.69%
-9.55%
N/A
SMH
6.45%
-1.75%
6.82%
31.77%
29.79%
26.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNCR vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNCR vs. SMH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CNCR
SMH
CNCR vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNCR vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.79% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF | 0.42% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
CNCR vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNCR drawdown since its inception was -72.14%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -83.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCR and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNCR vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) is 9.17%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 12.33%. This indicates that CNCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.