PBD vs. RNRG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PBD (Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF) and RNRG (Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - PBD tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index while RNRG tracks the Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PBD returned 9.45%/yr vs 4.47%/yr for RNRG. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for RNRG.

Performance

PBD vs. RNRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBD achieves a 38.50% return, which is significantly higher than RNRG's 17.66% return. Over the past 10 years, PBD has outperformed RNRG with an annualized return of 9.45%, while RNRG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.47% annualized return.

PBD

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 6.10%
• YTD: 38.50%
• 6M: 39.82%
• 1Y: 92.04%
• 3Y*: 8.96%
• 5Y*: -3.66%
• 10Y*: 9.45%

RNRG

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: 17.66%
• 6M: 17.51%
• 1Y: 42.65%
• 3Y*: 4.44%
• 5Y*: -2.70%
• 10Y*: 4.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBD vs. RNRG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF	38.50%	43.65%	-26.39%	-10.69%	-29.70%	-22.30%	145.46%	40.00%	-19.32%	28.72%
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	17.66%	29.61%	-22.00%	-12.82%	-15.30%	-12.78%	26.67%	37.04%	-6.22%	21.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PBD and RNRG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015	0.65

The correlation between PBD and RNRG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

PBD vs. RNRG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PBD	RNRG
Industrials	48.1%	3.0%
Energy	12.4%	-
Utilities	12.0%	92.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	-
Technology	6.8%	2.2%
Basic Materials	3.4%	2.1%
Financial Services	1.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

PBD vs. RNRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBD

PBD Risk / Return Rank: 94
PBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PBD Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PBD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

RNRG

RNRG Risk / Return Rank: 84
RNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
RNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
RNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 75
RNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBD vs. RNRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBD	RNRG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.96	2.72	+1.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.64	3.58	+1.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.45	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.65	7.20	+1.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	26.96	19.98	+6.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PBD vs. RNRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBD Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is higher than the RNRG Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBD and RNRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBD	RNRG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.96	2.72	+1.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	-0.13	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.23	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.07	-0.04

Drawdowns

PBD vs. RNRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBD drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, which is greater than RNRG's maximum drawdown of -58.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBD and RNRG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBD	RNRG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.60%	-58.79%	-19.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.70%	-5.95%	-4.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.45%	-35.23%	-17.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.15%	-52.17%	-16.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.40%	-58.79%	-16.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.02%	-30.37%	-8.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.40%	-24.45%	-28.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	2.14%	+1.29%

Volatility

PBD vs. RNRG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) has a higher volatility of 8.57% compared to Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) at 5.55%. This indicates that PBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBD	RNRG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.57%	5.55%	+3.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.00%	12.10%	+4.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.41%	15.77%	+7.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.37%	20.10%	+8.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.26%	19.67%	+7.59%

PBD vs. RNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RNRG's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBD vs. RNRG - Dividend Comparison

PBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than RNRG's 1.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF	1.63%	2.71%	1.81%	2.85%	2.98%	0.67%	0.48%	1.83%	1.86%	1.76%	2.04%	1.24%
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	1.28%	1.50%	1.48%	1.44%	1.15%	1.10%	3.16%	2.97%	5.22%	4.14%	5.02%	3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBD and RNRG in my portfolio?

PBD and RNRG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBD or RNRG?

PBD has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to RNRG (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBD dropped -78.60% vs RNRG's -58.79%.

Which ETF is better, PBD or RNRG?

On 10-year performance, PBD leads with 9.45% vs 4.47% for RNRG. On fees, RNRG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, RNRG has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PBD or RNRG?

Over the 10-year period, PBD has performed better with a 9.45% return vs 4.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBD or RNRG?

RNRG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PBD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBD or RNRG?

PBD has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.28% for RNRG.

What is the main difference between PBD and RNRG?

PBD tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index, while RNRG tracks Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PBD and 0.65% for RNRG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.