PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBCKX vs. LTINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBCKX vs. LTINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) and Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PBCKX

1D
-0.73%
1M
2.30%
6M
-2.85%
YTD
-1.87%
1Y
-2.03%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
6.61%
10Y*
16.02%

LTINX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBCKX vs. LTINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBCKX
Principal Blue Chip Fund
-1.87%9.20%26.90%40.58%-30.74%25.05%34.77%45.22%2.83%28.85%
LTINX
Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund
3.69%10.61%10.67%11.15%-13.61%7.41%11.87%16.32%-4.72%13.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PBCKX and LTINX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2012

0.85

The correlation between PBCKX and LTINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBCKX vs. LTINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBCKX
PBCKX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PBCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PBCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

LTINX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBCKX vs. LTINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) and Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBCKXLTINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.25

PBCKX vs. LTINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBCKX vs. LTINX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBCKXLTINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.68%

Volatility

PBCKX vs. LTINX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBCKXLTINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.20%

PBCKX vs. LTINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBCKX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than LTINX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBCKX vs. LTINX - Dividend Comparison

PBCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.32%, more than LTINX's 18.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTINX
Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund
18.99%11.91%10.80%4.75%7.98%8.21%5.51%12.76%9.62%7.62%3.63%8.86%
PBCKX
Principal Blue Chip Fund
20.32%19.94%9.01%0.51%0.71%6.67%3.28%8.90%7.86%2.79%1.01%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBCKX and LTINX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBCKX and LTINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer