PBCKX vs. LTINX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PBCKX (Principal Blue Chip Fund) and LTINX (Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund) are both mutual funds - PBCKX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal, while LTINX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, PBCKX returned 16.51%/yr vs 6.58%/yr for LTINX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBCKX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for LTINX.

Performance

PBCKX vs. LTINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) and Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBCKX achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than LTINX's 4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PBCKX has outperformed LTINX with an annualized return of 16.51%, while LTINX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.58% annualized return.

PBCKX

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: 0.26%
• 6M: 0.06%
• 1Y: 4.52%
• 3Y*: 18.79%
• 5Y*: 9.06%
• 10Y*: 16.51%

LTINX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 4.15%
• 6M: 4.26%
• 1Y: 11.43%
• 3Y*: 10.65%
• 5Y*: 4.75%
• 10Y*: 6.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBCKX vs. LTINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund	0.26%	9.20%	26.90%	40.58%	-30.74%	25.05%	34.77%	45.22%	2.83%	28.85%
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund	4.15%	10.61%	10.67%	11.15%	-13.61%	7.41%	11.87%	16.32%	-4.72%	13.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PBCKX and LTINX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2012	0.86

The correlation between PBCKX and LTINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PBCKX vs. LTINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBCKX

PBCKX Risk / Return Rank: 4
PBCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PBCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
PBCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
PBCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
PBCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

LTINX

LTINX Risk / Return Rank: 57
LTINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
LTINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LTINX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
LTINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
LTINX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBCKX vs. LTINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) and Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBCKX	LTINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	2.21	-1.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	3.22	-2.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.43	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.26	2.71	-2.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.79	12.04	-11.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PBCKX vs. LTINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBCKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the LTINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBCKX and LTINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBCKX	LTINX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33	2.21	-1.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.65	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	0.90	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.51	+0.35

Drawdowns

PBCKX vs. LTINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBCKX drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, smaller than the maximum LTINX drawdown of -44.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBCKX and LTINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBCKX	LTINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.00%	-44.03%	+6.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.10%	-4.29%	-14.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.10%	-6.16%	-12.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.00%	-18.54%	-19.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.00%	-18.54%	-19.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.54%	0.00%	-3.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.65%	-5.18%	-0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.26%	0.96%	+5.30%

Volatility

PBCKX vs. LTINX - Volatility Comparison

Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) at 1.80%. This indicates that PBCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBCKX	LTINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	1.80%	+1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.17%	4.30%	+7.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.12%	5.25%	+9.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.35%	7.34%	+13.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.21%	7.34%	+12.87%

PBCKX vs. LTINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBCKX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than LTINX's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBCKX vs. LTINX - Dividend Comparison

PBCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.89%, more than LTINX's 11.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund	11.43%	11.91%	10.80%	4.75%	7.98%	8.21%	5.51%	12.76%	9.62%	7.62%	3.63%	8.86%
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund	19.89%	19.94%	9.01%	0.51%	0.71%	6.67%	3.28%	8.90%	7.86%	2.79%	1.01%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBCKX and LTINX in my portfolio?

PBCKX and LTINX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBCKX or LTINX?

PBCKX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to LTINX (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBCKX dropped -38.00% vs LTINX's -44.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LTINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.