PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PBCKX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PBCKX and FCNTX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

PBCKX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.04%
5.53%
PBCKX
FCNTX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PBCKX:

0.88

FCNTX:

1.35

Sortino Ratio

PBCKX:

1.20

FCNTX:

1.86

Omega Ratio

PBCKX:

1.17

FCNTX:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

PBCKX:

1.31

FCNTX:

2.02

Martin Ratio

PBCKX:

3.87

FCNTX:

6.99

Ulcer Index

PBCKX:

3.36%

FCNTX:

3.14%

Daily Std Dev

PBCKX:

14.76%

FCNTX:

16.23%

Max Drawdown

PBCKX:

-41.86%

FCNTX:

-48.74%

Current Drawdown

PBCKX:

-7.59%

FCNTX:

-3.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBCKX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, PBCKX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 11.44%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.50% annualized return.


PBCKX

YTD

1.24%

1M

-3.25%

6M

3.04%

1Y

10.24%

5Y*

9.69%

10Y*

11.44%

FCNTX

YTD

3.66%

1M

-1.58%

6M

5.53%

1Y

18.61%

5Y*

15.24%

10Y*

13.50%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PBCKX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBCKX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


PBCKX
Principal Blue Chip Fund
Expense ratio chart for PBCKX: current value at 0.66% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.66%
Expense ratio chart for FCNTX: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PBCKX vs. FCNTX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBCKX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PBCKX is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PBCKX is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PBCKX is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PBCKX is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PBCKX is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PBCKX is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCNTX is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PBCKX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PBCKX, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.881.35
The chart of Sortino ratio for PBCKX, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.201.86
The chart of Omega ratio for PBCKX, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.171.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for PBCKX, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.312.02
The chart of Martin ratio for PBCKX, currently valued at 3.87, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.003.876.99
PBCKX
FCNTX

The current PBCKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBCKX and FCNTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.88
1.35
PBCKX
FCNTX

Dividends

PBCKX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

PBCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than FCNTX's 0.06% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PBCKX
Principal Blue Chip Fund
0.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.34%0.00%0.02%0.46%0.43%0.58%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund Fund
0.06%0.08%0.48%13.65%10.80%8.01%4.16%9.14%5.54%0.30%0.31%7.55%

Drawdowns

PBCKX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBCKX drawdown since its inception was -41.86%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -48.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBCKX and FCNTX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-7.59%
-3.82%
PBCKX
FCNTX

Volatility

PBCKX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) is 3.17%, while Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that PBCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.17%
4.57%
PBCKX
FCNTX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab