PBCKX vs. VTV
PBCKX (Principal Blue Chip Fund) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both funds - PBCKX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Over the past 10 years, PBCKX returned 15.76%/yr vs 12.57%/yr for VTV. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PBCKX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
PBCKX vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBCKX achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 16.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PBCKX has outperformed VTV with an annualized return of 15.76%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.57% annualized return.
PBCKX
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- 6M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 1Y
- -3.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- 15.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.50%
VTV
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 27.94%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $688.19M | $688.42M | $619.05M |
PBCKX vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund | -2.47% | 9.20% | 26.90% | 40.58% | -30.74% | 25.05% | 34.77% | 45.22% | 2.83% | 28.85% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 16.37% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBCKX and VTV is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2012 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PBCKX and VTV has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBCKX vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
PBCKX
VTV
PBCKX vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBCKX | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.47 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 4.24 | -4.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 16.42 | -17.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBCKX vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBCKX drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBCKX and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBCKX | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.00% | -59.27% | +21.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.10% | -6.35% | -12.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.10% | -14.52% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.00% | -17.04% | -20.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.00% | -36.78% | -1.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.17% | -1.36% | -4.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.66% | -7.82% | +2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.87% | 1.64% | +5.23% |
Volatility
PBCKX vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.62%. This indicates that PBCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBCKX | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 2.62% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.43% | 7.72% | +5.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.32% | 10.36% | +5.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.52% | 13.82% | +6.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 16.61% | +3.62% |
PBCKX vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBCKX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBCKX vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
PBCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.45%, more than VTV's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund | 20.45% | 19.94% | 9.01% | 0.51% | 0.71% | 6.67% | 3.28% | 8.90% | 7.86% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 2.40% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBCKX and VTV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBCKX has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to VTV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBCKX dropped -38.00% vs VTV's -59.27%.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBCKX and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer