PortfoliosLab logo
LTINX vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LTINX and VOO is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

LTINX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LTINX:

1.11

VOO:

0.74

Sortino Ratio

LTINX:

1.48

VOO:

1.04

Omega Ratio

LTINX:

1.20

VOO:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

LTINX:

1.18

VOO:

0.68

Martin Ratio

LTINX:

4.93

VOO:

2.58

Ulcer Index

LTINX:

1.43%

VOO:

4.93%

Daily Std Dev

LTINX:

6.84%

VOO:

19.54%

Max Drawdown

LTINX:

-42.89%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

LTINX:

0.00%

VOO:

-3.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTINX achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, LTINX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 4.89%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.81% annualized return.


LTINX

YTD

3.13%

1M

1.78%

6M

0.81%

1Y

7.56%

3Y*

5.28%

5Y*

5.13%

10Y*

4.89%

VOO

YTD

0.90%

1M

6.28%

6M

-1.46%

1Y

14.27%

3Y*

14.31%

5Y*

15.89%

10Y*

12.81%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

LTINX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTINX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LTINX vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTINX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LTINX is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LTINX is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LTINX is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LTINX is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LTINX is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LTINX is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LTINX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LTINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTINX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LTINX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

LTINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, more than VOO's 1.29% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LTINX
Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund
6.85%7.06%4.74%7.97%8.21%5.51%12.77%9.61%7.63%3.63%8.86%5.82%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.29%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

LTINX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTINX drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTINX and VOO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LTINX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) is 1.56%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that LTINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...