PAWZ vs. SPGM
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM).
PAWZ and SPGM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAWZ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FactSet Pet Care Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2018. SPGM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC World IMI. It was launched on Feb 27, 2012. Both PAWZ and SPGM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PAWZ vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAWZ vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF | -6.00% | 1.21% | 3.88% | 12.47% | -40.08% | 10.46% | 61.69% | 22.95% | -9.71% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | -1.30% | 23.62% | 16.75% | 21.34% | -17.53% | 21.13% | 15.28% | 26.58% | -7.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAWZ achieves a -6.00% return, which is significantly lower than SPGM's -1.30% return.
PAWZ
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -10.53%
- YTD
- -6.00%
- 6M
- -8.19%
- 1Y
- -1.00%
- 3Y*
- 1.77%
- 5Y*
- -6.17%
- 10Y*
- —
SPGM
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- -1.30%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 23.79%
- 3Y*
- 17.35%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAWZ vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAWZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAWZ vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank
PAWZ
SPGM
PAWZ vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAWZ | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | 1.37 | -1.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.05 | 1.98 | -1.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.30 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 1.99 | -2.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 9.40 | -9.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAWZ | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 | 1.37 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | 0.61 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.60 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAWZ and SPGM is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PAWZ vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison
PAWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than SPGM's 1.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF | 0.81% | 0.81% | 0.63% | 0.44% | 0.54% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.35% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 1.91% | 1.89% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 2.37% | 1.94% | 1.45% | 2.46% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 1.87% | 3.70% |
Drawdowns
PAWZ vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAWZ drawdown since its inception was -50.07%, which is greater than SPGM's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAWZ and SPGM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAWZ | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.07% | -33.97% | -16.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.80% | -11.96% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.07% | -25.93% | -24.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.47% | -6.60% | -30.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.18% | -4.85% | -17.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.52% | 2.53% | +3.99% |
Volatility
PAWZ vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) is 5.42%, while SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that PAWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAWZ | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 6.58% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.51% | 10.18% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.36% | 17.47% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 15.95% | +4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 17.56% | +4.17% |